Dual Display CT Scanner Interface Parallel Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing CT scanner user interfaces are inefficient due to their linear, sequential architecture, which leads to bottlenecks and fails to support multi-tasking workflow, collaboration, and consistency in scan quality, lacking proper identification of users involved in the patient experience and clear presentation of the CT exam workflow.

Innovation Solution

A dual-display user interface for CT scanners, with distinct zones on each display for setup, scanning, and post-processing tasks, allowing operators to manage patient records, scan protocols, and radiation dosage, enabling multi-tasking and collaboration while maintaining focused attention on specific steps and reducing cognitive load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a linear, sequential user interface architecture is used, then the system is simple to design and implement, but it creates bottlenecks and reduces overall efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall efficiencyVSAvoiduser interface architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface is divided into multiple independent workspaces, each capable of displaying different functional areas (scanning, post-processing, patient management). This segmentation allows operators to perform multiple tasks simultaneously in different workspaces, eliminating the sequential bottleneck while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a one-dimensional sequential workflow to a two-dimensional parallel workspace architecture. Multiple workspaces can be arranged spatially on the display, allowing operators to switch between scanning, post-processing, and administrative tasks without leaving their current context, thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single display is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but it fails to support multi-tasking workflow and collaboration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-tasking capabilityVSAvoiddisplay configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each workspace within the multi-display interface is designed to be universal and configurable, capable of displaying any combination of functional areas based on operator needs. This multi-functionality allows the same hardware configuration to support various workflow patterns including multi-tasking, collaboration, and different scan types, without requiring additional specialized displays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the user interface focuses on system tasks like post-processing, then comprehensive functionality is achieved, but bottlenecks are created that reduce efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow smoothnessVSAvoidbottleneck time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The interface allows operators to prepare and configure post-processing parameters in advance while the scanner is acquiring data, or to set up multiple processing queues before scanning begins. This preliminary configuration reduces the time spent on post-processing bottlenecks by having everything ready beforehand, maintaining ease of operation while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The parallel workspace architecture enables the scanning process to continue uninterrupted while post-processing operations are performed in a separate workspace. Operators can monitor scan progress in one workspace while reviewing or preparing post-processing tasks in another, ensuring continuous productive action without bottlenecks halting the workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Reliability

If comprehensive scan controls and monitoring are provided, then scan quality consistency is improved, but the interface becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan quality consistencyVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each workspace can be customized to display the specific controls and monitoring parameters most relevant to that function. The scanning workspace shows quality assurance parameters and protocol settings, while post-processing workspaces display different metrics. This local specialization maintains comprehensive quality control without requiring all controls to be visible simultaneously, managing interface complexity through context-relevant information display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9078566B2Dual display CT scanner user interface
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US9078566B2 patent drawing
  • US9078566B2 patent drawing
  • US9078566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A CT user interface includes first and second displays that enable an operator to perform set-up and scanning tasks associated with performing CT scans and enable the operator to perform image post-processing tasks associated with the CT scans. A plurality of distinct display zones are selectively displayed on the first and second displays, with the first display displaying a zone enabling the operator to create a record for each of a plurality of patients, a task list zone displaying all steps and sub-steps of a CT scan to be performed for a selected patient based on a selected scan protocol, a settings zone and a scanning zone displaying and enabling operator selection of scan parameters related to the selected scan protocol for the selected patient, and a dose area zone displaying a relationship between the selected scan parameters and a radiation dosage experienced by the patient based thereon.