Dual Drive Wheel Track System for Slippage Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tracked work machines experience inefficiencies and unpredictable control due to slippage between drive wheels and tracks, which occurs when the drive wheel's size is insufficient to prevent slipping or skipping, leading to inefficient power transfer and control issues.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual drive wheel system with a gear assembly that rotationally couples both drive wheels to a drive shaft, allowing for either cogged or frictional engagement with the track, and utilizing planetary gear sets and intermediate gears to ensure proper torque transfer and synchronization of drive wheel speeds, regardless of their diameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single drive wheel is used to engage the track, then the structure is simple, but slippage occurs between the drive wheel and track resulting in inefficient power transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive wheel structureVSAvoidpower transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The single drive wheel is segmented into two separate drive wheels (first and second drive wheels) that independently engage the track. This segmentation allows each wheel to contribute to power transfer, reducing slippage and improving overall power transfer efficiency while distributing the mechanical load across multiple contact points with the track.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Two drive wheels are combined to work together on the same track, merging their power transfer functions. The gear assembly merges the rotational input from a single drive shaft to simultaneously drive both wheels, creating a composite drive system that eliminates slippage through multiple engagement points while maintaining structural integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of energy

If the drive wheel is sized larger to avoid slippage, then power transfer efficiency improves, but the device size and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer efficiencyVSAvoiddrive wheel size
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using one large drive wheel, the system segments the drive function into two smaller drive wheels. Each wheel can be optimized to a smaller, lighter size while collectively providing sufficient track engagement to prevent slippage, thereby reducing overall weight while maintaining power transfer efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each drive wheel is designed with specific local characteristics (such as cogged or friction surfaces) optimized for its engagement point on the track. This allows smaller wheels to achieve effective traction through localized surface treatments or geometric features rather than relying solely on increased size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If different sized drive wheels are used, then adaptability to different track conditions improves, but synchronization between wheels becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack condition adaptabilityVSAvoidgear assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A gear assembly acts as an intermediary mechanism between the drive shaft and the two different-sized drive wheels. This intermediary system includes gears and gear trains that translate the rotational input into synchronized rotation of wheels with different diameters, managing the complexity through modular gear components rather than direct mechanical coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The gear assembly changes the rotational parameters (speed and torque) differently for each drive wheel based on its size and track engagement requirements. By adjusting gear ratios, the system accommodates different wheel diameters and optimizes each wheel's performance for specific track conditions while maintaining overall synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If a cogged drive wheel is used to prevent slippage, then power transfer reliability improves, but the risk of teeth skipping or disengagement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer reliabilityVSAvoidtooth skipping or disengagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cogged drive wheel design is segmented into two separate cogged drive wheels. This segmentation distributes the mechanical load and engagement stress across multiple tooth interfaces, reducing the likelihood of any single tooth skipping or disengaging. If one tooth pair experiences problematic loading, the other drive wheel continues to provide reliable engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates friction surfaces in addition to cogged surfaces, providing a cushioning effect that prevents harsh impacts and reduces the risk of tooth skipping. The friction engagement acts as a buffer that smooths out load variations before they reach the cogged interfaces, protecting against disengagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces slippage and skipping, enhancing power transfer efficiency and providing predictable machine control by ensuring both drive wheels contribute to track movement, regardless of their size differences.

Implementation Method 1

a gear assembly rotationally coupling both the first drive wheel and the second drive wheel to the drive shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear: Gear

Implementation Method 2

the other of the first and second drive wheels is a friction drive wheel that transfers torque to the track by frictionally engaging the track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10953744B2Dual drive track system
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 DEERE & CO
  • US10953744B2 patent drawing
  • US10953744B2 patent drawing
  • US10953744B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A track assembly that has a drive shaft providing torque to the track assembly, a first drive wheel, a second drive wheel, and a gear assembly rotationally coupling both the first drive wheel and the second drive wheel to the drive shaft.