Dual-Energy CT Pre-Reconstruction Decomposition for Beam Hardening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dual-energy CT methods face challenges with beam hardening artifacts and computational inefficiencies, particularly due to the use of polychromatic X-ray sources, which complicate the inversion of Radon transform and lead to inaccurate and computationally demanding image reconstruction.

Innovation Solution

A pre-reconstruction decomposition method that separates projections into linear and non-linear beam hardening terms, using an iterative approach to solve for line integrals, and a calibration method to obtain parameters even when x-ray spectra are not well known, allowing for stable and efficient reconstruction of basis images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If polychromatic X-ray sources are used for dual-energy CT scanning, then practical imaging is enabled, but beam hardening artifacts and nonlinear inversion problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepractical imaging capabilityVSAvoidbeam hardening artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the polychromatic X-ray spectrum into two distinct energy spectra (first and second energy spectra) by operating the X-ray source at different tube voltages. This segmentation enables separate projection data acquisition at each energy level, which is fundamental for dual-energy decomposition and artifact reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameter of tube voltage to generate different energy spectra. By acquiring projection data at two different tube voltages (e.g., 80 kV and 140 kV), the system creates energy-selective projections that can be mathematically decomposed to eliminate beam hardening artifacts while maintaining practical imaging capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If polynomial approximation methods are used for pre-reconstruction decomposition, then computational speed is improved, but accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoiddecomposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an iterative feedback mechanism where the decomposition process repeatedly refines the line integral values by comparing calculated projections with measured projections and adjusting the solution accordingly. This feedback loop continues until convergence criteria are met, ensuring high accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency through optimized iteration schemes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary decomposition of projection data into basis material components before the actual image reconstruction process. By pre-processing the projection data to separate different tissue types (e.g., bone, soft tissue, contrast agent) and their respective line integrals, the system eliminates beam hardening artifacts early in the pipeline, improving both accuracy and overall computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If indirect polynomial approximation is used to improve accuracy, then computational drawbacks and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecomposition accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex iterative polynomial solving methods with a streamlined algebraic solution approach. By formulating the decomposition problem as a system of linear equations based on the two energy spectra measurements, the system achieves accurate decomposition without the computational burden of indirect polynomial approximation methods, reducing both complexity and computation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively reduces beam hardening artifacts and improves computational efficiency, producing accurate and stable images with reduced noise amplification, enabling the generation of monochromatic images and tissue composition maps.

Implementation Method 1

beam hardening, because as the polychromatic beam transverses the patient, the softer--lower energy--photons are preferentially absorbed or scattered out of the beam, leaving the harder photons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam hardening: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

two components of photon absorptions, i.e. photoelectric and Compton processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric absorption: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

two components of photon absorptions, i.e. photoelectric and Compton processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompton scattering: Compton Scattering

Data Source

PatentEP2133840B1Method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for pre-reconstruction decomposition and calibration in dual energy computed tomography
Publication Date: 2014.03.05 KK TOSHIBA
  • EP2133840B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2133840B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2133840B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of obtaining a computed tomography image of an object includes determining linear terms and non-linear beam hardening terms in a pair of line integral equations for dual-energy projection data from inserting average and difference from average attenuation terms, obtaining an initial solution of the line integral equation by setting the non-linear beam hardening terms to zero, and iteratively solving the line integral equations to obtain one line integral equations for each basis material. Attenuation by the first basis material corresponds to a photoelectric attenuation process, and attenuation by the second basis material corresponds to a Compton attenuation process. The line integral equations can be inverted by an inverse Radon procedure such as filtered backprojection to give images of each basis material. The images of each basis material can then be optionally combined to give monochromatic images, density and effective atomic number images, or photoelectric and Compton processes images.