Dual Evaluation Fill Level Measurement Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fill level measuring devices using the travel-time principle face challenges in reliably monitoring predetermined fill levels under difficult conditions, such as signal disturbances and complex signal processing, which complicates error-free functioning and increases costs, space, and maintenance requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that utilize a dual evaluation approach within a fill level measuring device, where echo signals are processed in a first evaluation method to determine the fill level and in a second independent evaluation method to monitor exceeding or falling below predetermined fill levels, using separate signal processing branches for each task to ensure high safety standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex signal registering, signal conditioning, and/or signal evaluation methods are applied to achieve reliable measurements under difficult measuring conditions, then measurement reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monitoring task into two independent evaluation methods: a first evaluation method for general fill level measurement and a second evaluation method specifically for monitoring predetermined fill levels. This segmentation allows each method to be optimized independently, with the second method being simpler and more reliable for safety-critical monitoring, thereby improving overall reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If additional fill level limit switches are installed to monitor predetermined fill levels, then monitoring reliability is improved, but cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring reliabilityVSAvoidcost and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the fill level measuring device multi-functional by integrating two evaluation methods into a single device. The first evaluation method handles general fill level measurement while the second evaluation method handles predetermined fill level monitoring. This universal approach eliminates the need for separate limit switches, reducing cost and maintenance while maintaining monitoring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If a single evaluation method is used for both fill level determination and predetermined fill level monitoring, then device complexity is reduced, but monitoring reliability and safety standards cannot be satisfied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmonitoring reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different evaluation qualities to different functions: the first evaluation method uses complex signal processing suitable for general measurement, while the second evaluation method uses a simpler, more robust approach optimized specifically for monitoring predetermined fill levels. This local differentiation of evaluation quality ensures each function receives the appropriate level of processing complexity, satisfying safety standards without unnecessary overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable monitoring of fill levels that meets high safety standards, simplifies testing and debugging, and reduces the need for additional fill level limit switches, thereby reducing costs and maintenance while ensuring accurate detection of limit level violations.

Implementation Method 1

signals, for instance, microwave signals or ultrasonic signals, are periodically sent toward the surface of a fill substance by means of a sending and receiving element and their echo signals reflected on the surface are then received following a distance dependent travel-time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEcho: Echo

Implementation Method 2

a microwave signal is continuously transmitted which is periodically frequency modulated, for example, on the basis of a sawtooth function. The frequency of the received echo signals exhibits, therefore, compared with the instantaneous frequency possessed by the transmission signal, at the point in time of its receipt, a frequency difference which depends on the travel-time of the echo signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency modulation: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentUS7826309B2Filling level measurement device and filling level measurement and monitoring method
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 ENDRESS & HAUSER GMBH & CO KG
  • US7826309B2 patent drawing
  • US7826309B2 patent drawing
  • US7826309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for measuring a fill level of a fill substance in a container and for monitoring at least one predetermined fill level (LMIN, LMAX), using a fill level measuring device working according to the travel-time principle, as well as a corresponding fill level measuring device, wherein the monitoring satisfies high safety standards, wherein, in each measuring cycle, transmission signals (S) are sent toward the fill substance and their echo signals (E) are received, the fill level is determined, based on the echo signals (E), in a first evaluation method, and it is determined, based on the echo signals (E), in a second evaluation method independent of the first evaluation method, whether the fill level exceeds or falls beneath the predetermined fill levels (LMIN, LMAX).