M-ary PAM Digital Equalizer with Dual Feedforward Architecture
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional M-ary PAM systems face increased device area, power consumption, and circuit complexity due to the use of digital loop-unrolled decision-feedback equalizers, and alternative techniques like look-ahead loop-unrolled architectures complicate circuit design.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of multiple feedforward equalizers in combination with an improved look-ahead loop-unrolled N-tap decision-feedback equalizer in a receiver architecture, where one FFE operates as a primary equalizer and another as a secondary FFE to eliminate unnecessary decisions, reducing circuit complexity and power consumption.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If digital loop-unrolled decision-feedback equalizer is used in M-ary PAM systems, then signal equalization performance is improved, but device area and power consumption increase
Solution Approach 1:
The equalization function is segmented into two independent feedforward equalizers (FFE1 and FFE2) instead of using a single complex decision-feedback equalizer. Each FFE processes signals independently without requiring feedback paths, thereby reducing the overall circuit complexity and device area while maintaining equalization performance.
Solution Approach 2:
The feedback mechanism is extracted and removed from the system. Instead of using a decision-feedback equalizer that requires complex feedback loops and decision logic, the patent extracts only the feedforward equalization function, simplifying the circuit architecture and reducing power consumption.
2Reliability
If digital loop-unrolled decision-feedback equalizer is used in M-ary PAM systems, then signal equalization performance is improved, but power consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The equalization function is segmented into two independent feedforward equalizers (FFE1 and FFE2) instead of using a single complex decision-feedback equalizer. Each FFE processes signals independently without requiring feedback paths, thereby reducing the overall circuit complexity and device area while maintaining equalization performance.
Solution Approach 2:
The feedback mechanism is extracted and removed from the system. Instead of using a decision-feedback equalizer that requires complex feedback loops and decision logic, the patent extracts only the feedforward equalization function, simplifying the circuit architecture and reducing power consumption.
3Loss of time
If look-ahead loop-unrolled architecture is used, then timing requirements are relaxed, but circuit complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The equalization function is segmented into two independent feedforward equalizers (FFE1 and FFE2) instead of using a single complex decision-feedback equalizer. Each FFE processes signals independently without requiring feedback paths, thereby reducing the overall circuit complexity and device area while maintaining equalization performance.
Data Source
AI summary
Some embodiments include apparatus and methods using an input node, an analog to digital converter (ADC) including an input coupled to the input node, a first feedforward equalizer (FFE) including an input coupled to an output of the ADC, a second FFE including an input coupled to the output of the ADC, and a decision feedback equalizer (DFE) including a first input, a second input, and an output, the first input coupled to an output of the first FFE, and the second input coupled to an output of the second FFE.


