Dual-Flap Valve Assembly for Symmetric Chamber Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing systems face challenges in precisely controlling high and low mass flow rates of process gases in semiconductor fabrication, leading to asymmetric flow regulation and pressure control, which can result in erratic flow and pressure buildup, affecting the quality of deposited films.

Innovation Solution

A valve assembly with a housing, a first flap coupled to a first shaft and a second flap coupled to a second shaft, along with gear assemblies, is designed to rotate the flaps from a closed to an open position and vice versa, allowing for symmetric control of gas flow, minimizing turbulence and corrosion, and optimizing pressure and flow rates in semiconductor process chambers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional throttling valves are used to control mass flow rates, then the system can control gas flow, but the flow control is asymmetric leading to erratic flow and pressure buildup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidflow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using two separate flaps (first flap and second flap) that can be independently controlled, rather than a single symmetric valve. This allows asymmetric adjustment of flow paths to achieve symmetric and stable flow control. The gear assembly coordinates the two flaps to move in complementary ways, resolving the erratic flow issues caused by conventional single-valve asymmetric throttling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The conventional single throttling valve is segmented into two separate flaps, each controlled by its own shaft and gear assembly. This segmentation allows independent control of different flow paths, enabling precise and stable flow regulation that eliminates the erratic behavior associated with single-valve systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If high mass flow rates are controlled using conventional valves, then high flow capability is achieved, but low flow rate precision is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass flow rateVSAvoidflow rate control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic control through independently adjustable flaps that can be positioned at different angles to optimize for different flow rates. At high flow rates, both flaps can be positioned for maximum opening; at low flow rates, the flaps can be adjusted to provide fine-grained control, achieving precision across the entire flow range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameter from single-valve opening degree to dual-flap positioning angles. By independently adjusting the first and second flaps, the system can optimize flow characteristics for different operating conditions, achieving both high flow capability and low flow precision through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If asymmetric flow regulation is used, then valve simplicity is maintained, but pressure control stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve structure simplicityVSAvoidpressure control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two valve mechanisms into a coordinated system controlled by a single gear assembly. This combination maintains operational simplicity while achieving stable pressure control through the complementary action of two flaps that balance flow regulation and reduce erratic pressure variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If conventional single-valve systems are used, then device complexity is low, but flow control precision and stability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve assembly complexityVSAvoidflow and pressure control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The valve assembly is segmented into two independently controllable flaps, each with its own shaft and gear-driven mechanism. This segmentation enables precise control of flow and pressure by adjusting each flap's position, achieving manufacturing precision that outweighs the moderate increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11359732B1Method and mechanism for symmetrically controlling pressure in process chamber
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US11359732B1 patent drawing
  • US11359732B1 patent drawing
  • US11359732B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a value assembly, methods of manufacturing the same, and methods of using the same. In one embodiment, a sensor assembly comprises a housing having a through-bore, a first flap coupled to a first shaft and a second flap coupled to a second shaft, wherein the first shaft and the second shaft are coupled within the housing; and one or more gear assemblies coupled to the first shaft and the second shaft, wherein the gear assemblies are configured to rotate the first flap and the second flap from a first position to a second position to prevent a flow from traversing through the through-bore, and from the second position to the first position to allow the flow to traverse through the through-bore.