Dual-Frame Yoke with Segmented Crossbars

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing yoke carry and tire flipping exercise apparatuses face issues such as torsional strain, instability, space inefficiency, and increased injury risk due to bulkiness and lack of adjustability, leading to suboptimal workout experiences and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A dual-frame exercise apparatus with adjustable crossbars, load posts, and ergonomic design that allows for weight and size adjustments, enhancing stability, space efficiency, and reducing injury risk by distributing weight closer to the body and providing a consistent grip position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard yoke carry apparatuses are used, then the exercise can be performed, but the apparatus is subject to torsional strain of the crossbar and instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus stabilityVSAvoidcrossbar torsional strain
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The crossbar is divided into multiple segments (first crossbar portion, second crossbar portion, third crossbar portion) that can independently move relative to each other. This segmentation allows each segment to absorb torsional forces independently, preventing the entire crossbar from experiencing damaging torsional strain while maintaining apparatus stability during yoke carry exercises.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The crossbar segments are designed to be movable relative to each other, transforming the rigid static structure into a dynamic one. This dynamic capability allows the crossbar to adapt to the forces applied during exercise, reducing torsional strain by allowing controlled movement rather than resisting all forces rigidly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Weight of moving object

If large tires are used for tire flipping exercises, then the weight requirement is met, but the apparatus becomes bulky and space inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetire weightVSAvoidtire bulk
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The tire flipping apparatus uses separate weight plates that can be independently selected and combined to achieve the desired weight. Instead of using a single large bulky tire, the weight is segmented into multiple plates that can be stacked on load posts, providing the necessary weight without the excessive bulk of large tires.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus allows changing the weight parameter by selecting different combinations of weight plates. This provides flexibility to adjust the weight for different exercise levels without requiring multiple large tires of different sizes, as the same apparatus structure can accommodate various weight configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple tires of different sizes are acquired for graduated training, then the training progression is enabled, but the storage space requirement increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining progressionVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus is designed as a universal system that can provide graduated training progression through a single multi-functional structure. The adjustable crossbars, movable segments, and selectable weight plates work together to enable multiple exercise types and resistance levels, eliminating the need for multiple specialized tires of different sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus enables training progression by allowing parameter changes in weight through different plate combinations and in geometry through adjustable crossbar positions. This single apparatus can replicate the functionality of multiple different-sized tires, providing graduated training without requiring proportional storage space for each variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If a single-type exercise apparatus is used, then the apparatus design is simple, but the space utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus designVSAvoidspace utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus integrates multiple functions into a single design, including yoke carry capability with adjustable crossbars, tire flipping capability with load posts and weight plates, and the ability to perform both exercises with the same structural framework. This multi-functionality maximizes space utilization by allowing one apparatus to replace what would traditionally require multiple separate exercise devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic components (movable crossbar segments, adjustable positions, selectable weight plates) allow the apparatus to reconfigure for different exercise types. This dynamic adaptability enables a single apparatus structure to efficiently serve multiple exercise purposes, improving space utilization without requiring overly complex separate specialized equipment for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11103742B2Exercise apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 VOLCANO STRENGTH LLC
  • US11103742B2 patent drawing
  • US11103742B2 patent drawing
  • US11103742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exercise apparatus is disclosed, comprising a first frame, a second frame aligned about parallel to the first frame, and at least three crossbars extending about orthogonally between inward faces of the frames. Each of the first frame and the second frame includes at least three vertices, at least three sides extending between the at least three vertices, at least three attachment struts disposed inward from the at least three vertices, and at least three load posts extending from an outward face of the frames. The at least three sides of each frame are formed of at least three frame struts. The at least three crossbars attach to one of the at least three attachment struts of the first frame and one of the at least three attachment struts of the second frame. The load posts are arranged and disposed to receive and releasably retain a plurality of weights.