Dual Fuel Adiabatic Reactor for Oxyfuel Deoxidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for catalytic deoxidation in oxyfuel processes face challenges such as restricted oxygen conversion per pass, high capital costs, and safety issues due to the use of single fuels in adiabatic reactors, especially when dealing with high oxygen concentrations.

Innovation Solution

A dual fuel approach is implemented using a series of adiabatic reactors with a first auxiliary fuel having a low ignition temperature (like hydrogen) and a second auxiliary fuel with high heat of reaction (like natural gas), allowing for efficient oxygen removal and heat recovery while controlling temperatures and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single auxiliary fuel is used in adiabatic reactors for catalytic deoxidation, then the device complexity is reduced, but the oxygen conversion efficiency per pass is restricted and safety issues arise due to runaway reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen conversion efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deoxidation process is segmented into multiple adiabatic reactor stages arranged in series. Each stage performs partial oxygen conversion, preventing runaway reactions while achieving high overall conversion efficiency. The segmentation allows the system to handle high oxygen concentrations safely by distributing the conversion across multiple controlled steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple auxiliary fuels (hydrogen and natural gas) in a dual-fuel approach within the segmented reactor system. Hydrogen provides low-temperature ignition capability to start the reaction, while natural gas contributes high heat of reaction for efficient oxygen conversion. This merging of fuel properties resolves the contradiction between safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If hydrogen is used as auxiliary fuel due to its low ignition temperature, then the ease of operation is improved, but the heat of reaction and overall energy efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidheat of reaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor system segments the fuel utilization process: hydrogen is used in early stages where low ignition temperature is needed to initiate combustion and operate easily, while natural gas is introduced in subsequent stages to provide high heat of reaction for efficient oxygen conversion. This segmentation allows both fuel types to发挥 their respective advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts fuel composition and flow rates across different reactor stages based on temperature and oxygen concentration profiles. This dynamic approach allows the system to leverage hydrogen's ease of ignition when needed and natural gas's high energy content when temperature and conversion efficiency are priorities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If natural gas is used as auxiliary fuel due to its high heat of reaction, then the energy efficiency is improved, but the ignition temperature requirement increases operational difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat of reactionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Hydrogen is used in preliminary reactor stages to ignite the combustion process and raise the temperature to levels where natural gas can effectively participate. This preliminary action by hydrogen removes the ignition temperature barrier for natural gas, allowing natural gas to then provide its high heat of reaction in subsequent stages without operational difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If adiabatic reactors are used to simplify the device structure, then the capital cost is reduced, but temperature control becomes difficult and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The adiabatic reactor system is segmented into multiple stages in series. Each individual reactor remains simple and adiabatic (without active cooling), maintaining low device complexity and capital cost. However, the series arrangement of multiple stages inherently controls temperature by allowing heat dissipation between stages, preventing runaway reactions and improving safety without requiring complex active temperature control in each reactor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This dual fuel system enhances oxygen conversion efficiency, reduces capital costs, and prevents runaway reactions by leveraging the lower ignition temperature of hydrogen and the higher reaction heat of natural gas, improving the overall efficiency and safety of the deoxidation process.

Implementation Method 1

a first auxiliary fuel, in particular hydrogen, and a second auxiliary fuel, in particular natural gas, are catalytically combusted with a part of the oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic combustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

catalytically combusted with a part of the oxygen contained in the secondary gas mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

a first auxiliary fuel, in particular hydrogen, and a second auxiliary fuel, in particular natural gas, are catalytically combusted with a part of the oxygen contained in the secondary gas mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic combustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 4

wherein effluents from the reactors are, prior to being passed into the next reactor, cooled by intercoolers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS11407645B2Method and apparatus for producing carbon dioxide
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 LINDE AG
  • US11407645B2 patent drawing
  • US11407645B2 patent drawing
  • US11407645B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for producing carbon dioxide by combusting a carbonaceous fuel with oxygen or with a gas mixture containing more than 25 mol % of oxygen obtaining a flue gas mixture, wherein the flue gas mixture is processed obtaining a secondary gas mixture containing carbon dioxide and oxygen, and wherein a part of the oxygen contained in the secondary gas mixture is catalytically reacted with a first auxiliary fuel in a reactor system comprising a series of multiple reactors, obtaining further carbon dioxide and water. A further part of the oxygen contained in the secondary gas mixture is catalytically reacted with a second auxiliary fuel in the reactor system. A corresponding apparatus is also described herein.