Dual Fuel Injection for Lean-Burn Engine Backfire Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fuel injection systems for internal combustion engines, particularly those using alternative fuels like hydrogen, are prone to misfires, backfires, and explosive events due to high flammability, requiring complex and expensive injectors, which are not readily available in all sizes.

Innovation Solution

The system controls the lambda value of the air-fuel mixture to be higher than 3 via intake valves and enriches it with fuel directly injected into the combustion chamber, using smaller and simpler injectors, and optionally incorporates exhaust gas recirculation to reduce flammability and combustibility risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fuel injection systems are used to supply air-fuel mixture to the intake manifold, then the fuel air mixture is created in or before the intake manifold with the total amount of fuel, but this creates large volumes of fuel air mixture with high tendency to combust, leading to misfires, backfires, or explosive events in the supply system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion safetyVSAvoidflammability risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection process is segmented into two distinct stages: first, a lean air-fuel mixture (lambda > 3) is supplied to the intake manifold to ensure safety; second, additional fuel is injected directly into the combustion chamber to achieve the required stoichiometric ratio. This segmentation separates the fuel supply function from the mixing function, allowing safe transport of fuel vapor while maintaining reliable combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The intake manifold acts as an intermediary chamber where a lean, safe air-fuel mixture is temporarily held before entering the combustion chamber. This intermediary approach allows the system to transport fuel vapor safely through the intake system while still delivering the necessary fuel quantity to the combustion chamber through direct injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If injectors are used to directly generate the air-fuel mixture provided for the main combustion engine, then the fuel can be injected directly into the main combustion chamber, but starting at a certain size of the internal combustion engines the injectors have to be constructed and manufactured with complex structures and/or big dimensions, substantially increasing the effort and costs for the manufacturing process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjector manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidair-fuel volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel delivery system is segmented into two independent injection systems: a port injection system that supplies lean mixture to the intake manifold, and a direct injection system that adds fuel directly to the combustion chamber. This allows the use of simpler, smaller injectors in the direct injection system while still achieving the required total fuel quantity for large engine displacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual injection system provides multi-functionality: the port injection system handles the bulk of fuel delivery in a safe, simplified manner, while the direct injection system fine-tunes the mixture and ensures proper combustion chamber filling. This universal approach works for engines of various sizes without requiring proportionally larger and more complex single injectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the air-fuel mixture is supplied with lambda value higher than 3 via intake valves, then the risk of misfires and backfires is reduced, but additional fuel must be injected directly into the combustion chamber to achieve proper combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoiddual injection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The injection system is segmented into two functional parts: port injection for safe, lean mixture delivery that prevents backfires, and direct injection for precise fuel metering in the combustion chamber. This segmentation allows each subsystem to be optimized independently, managing overall system complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the lambda parameter through two-stage fuel delivery: first maintaining lambda > 3 in the intake system for safety, then adjusting the overall mixture to proper stoichiometric ratios in the combustion chamber through direct injection. This parameter management approach resolves the contradiction between safety and combustion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the risk of misfires and backfires, allows the use of smaller, less complex injectors, and maintains efficient combustion, while achieving favorable costs and interchangeability across engine sizes.

Implementation Method 1

a fuel supply line fluidically connected to at least one fuel supply system, the at least one fuel supply system being configured to supply fuel, preferably hydrogen, directly into a main combustion chamber and/or a pre-combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel injection and mixing:

Implementation Method 2

at least one piston-cylinder unit in which an air-fuel mixture, preferably an air-hydrogen mixture, is combustible

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS12473870B2Internal combustion engine and method for operating an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 GE JENBACHER GMBH & CO OG
  • US12473870B2 patent drawing
  • US12473870B2 patent drawing
  • US12473870B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine controller, for an internal combustion engine, is configured to:control at least one actuator to provide an air-fuel mixture with a lambda value higher than 3 to a main combustion chamber via at least one intake valve, wherein the at least one actuator is arranged upstream of at least one intake port or which is arranged in the intake port;control at least one fuel supply system to provide fuel directly to the main combustion chamber and/or a pre-combustion chamber of a piston-cylinder unit such that at the time of ignition of the air-fuel mixture the lambda value of that air-fuel mixture in the main combustion chamber is lower than the lambda value of the air-fuel mixture provided to the main combustion chamber via the at least one intake valve.