Dual Fuel Injector Control for Soot Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Direct injection engines generate higher particulate matter emissions due to insufficient air-fuel mixing and turbulence, leading to localized rich combustion and soot formation, which degrades exhaust emissions.

Innovation Solution

A method that adjusts fuel injection between port and direct injectors based on soot load, increasing port injection and decreasing direct injection as soot levels rise, using sensors and engine operating conditions to optimize fuel ratios and timing, and adjusting spark timing to compensate for torque disturbances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If direct injection is used to achieve higher fuel efficiency and power output, then fuel efficiency and power output are improved, but particulate matter emissions increase due to insufficient air-fuel mixing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidparticulate matter emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection system is segmented into two separate injectors: a port fuel injector that injects fuel into the intake port, and a direct injector that injects fuel directly into the combustion chamber. This segmentation allows each injector to perform its specialized function - the port injector provides early fuel injection for better mixing, while the direct injector provides late injection for charge cooling and efficiency, resolving the contradiction between fuel efficiency and emissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different injection strategies are applied to different locations: port injection occurs in the intake port where turbulence and mixing time are abundant, while direct injection occurs in the combustion chamber where precision and charge cooling are critical. This local differentiation allows the system to optimize for both fuel efficiency (direct injection) and emissions control (port injection) simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If direct injection is used to achieve higher power output, then power output is improved, but soot formation increases due to localized rich combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidsoot formation
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The port fuel injector performs preliminary fuel injection into the intake port before the combustion chamber compression stroke, allowing fuel to mix with air in advance during the intake valve open period. This preliminary mixing action ensures that when direct injection occurs later, the combustion chamber has better-prepared air-fuel mixture, reducing localized rich conditions and soot formation while maintaining power output

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If fuel injection amount from direct injector is increased to improve fuel efficiency, then fuel efficiency is improved, but particulate matter emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidparticulate matter
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the fuel distribution ratio between the port injector and direct injector based on real-time operating conditions such as engine load, speed, and temperature. The controller continuously optimizes the injection strategy, increasing direct injection proportion during conditions favorable for mixing (high load, high temperature) to maximize fuel efficiency, while increasing port injection proportion during conditions prone to soot formation, thereby dynamically resolving the contradiction between fuel efficiency and emissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces exhaust particulate matter emissions without affecting engine fuel economy, leveraging the benefits of both direct and port injection methods.

Implementation Method 1

the charge cooling effect of the injected fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporative Cooler

Data Source

PatentUS8567370B2Method and system for engine control
Publication Date: 2013.10.29 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8567370B2 patent drawing
  • US8567370B2 patent drawing
  • US8567370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for controlling exhaust emissions by adjusting a fuel injection into an engine cylinder from a plurality of fuel injectors based on the fuel type of the injected fuel and further based on the soot load of the engine. Soot generated from direct fuel injection is reduced by decreasing an amount of direct injection into a cylinder as the engine soot load increases.