Dual-Gated Oxide-Semiconductor Transistor for Stable Non-Volatile Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional SRAM/MUX-based interconnect designs in FPGAs face challenges such as high area and power consumption, and significant time delays, while existing non-volatile switches like RRAM suffer from noise and stability issues due to 2-terminal operation.

Innovation Solution

A 4-terminal transistor with a dual-gated structure, featuring a sandwich-layer oxide-semiconductor channel with a middle layer having a lower bond dissociation energy, which eliminates the need for an additional access transistor and enhances stability and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If conventional SRAM/MUX-based interconnect design is used, then routing functionality is achieved, but area consumption increases to 70% of total chip area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting areaVSAvoidreconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational state parameter of interconnects from volatile (SRAM/MUX) to non-volatile (FeFET), enabling reconfigurable computing without requiring large routing resources. The FeFET's ability to maintain configuration state without power allows dramatic reduction in routing area while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from 2-terminal RRAM operation to 3-terminal FeFET operation, adding a gate terminal that provides control over the conductive state. This dimensional change enables independent control of memory state and signal routing, eliminating the need for additional access transistors and reducing routing area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Use of energy by stationary object

If conventional SRAM/MUX-based interconnect design is used, then routing functionality is achieved, but power consumption increases to 60% of total power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidrouting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the power state parameter from continuous power requirement (volatile SRAM/MUX) to power-free state retention (non-volatile FeFET). The FeFET maintains its configuration without power, enabling routing functionality with dramatically reduced power consumption while improving routing efficiency through faster switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If 2-terminal RRAM is used as programmable interconnect, then area efficiency is improved, but noise from interconnect signal reduces stability and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting areaVSAvoidsignal stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the RRAM functionality into two separate terminals: one for memory state control and one for signal routing. The FeFET's gate terminal handles memory programming while the source-drain terminal handles signal transmission, eliminating noise interference and improving signal stability while maintaining area efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the gate dielectric layer as an intermediary between the gate electrode and the channel. This intermediary isolates the memory storage element from the routed signal current, preventing noise from the interconnect signal from affecting the memory state while maintaining the area efficiency of non-volatile operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Area of stationary object

If 3-terminal single-gated FeFET is used, then routing area is reduced, but device structure challenges and interface defects cause memory-read-write disturbance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting areaVSAvoidmemory operation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the FeFET structure into dual gates with distinct functions: one gate for memory programming and one gate for signal control. This segmentation allows independent optimization of memory operation and signal routing, eliminating the memory-read-write disturbance problem while maintaining compact routing area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different characteristics to different parts of the FeFET structure through the dual-gate design. Each gate can be independently controlled with different voltages and timing, allowing local optimization of memory write operations and read operations to prevent disturbance while maintaining overall device compactness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250169094A1Transistor and method of forming the same
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE
  • US20250169094A1 patent drawing
  • US20250169094A1 patent drawing
  • US20250169094A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments may relate to a transistor including a channel, a source and a drain in contact with opposite ends of the channel. The transistor may also include a first gate, and a first gate dielectric layer including a portion between the first gate and the channel. The transistor may also include a second gate, and a second gate dielectric layer including a portion between the second gate and the channel. The channel may include a first oxide-semiconductor layer including a first oxide-semiconductor material, a second oxide-semiconductor layer including a second oxide-semiconductor material, and a middle oxide-semiconductor layer between the first oxide-semiconductor layer and the second oxide-semiconductor layer, the middle oxide-semiconductor layer including a third oxide-semiconductor material. The third oxide-semiconductor material may have a bond dissociation energy lower than a bond dissociation energy of the first oxide-semiconductor material and a bond dissociation energy of the second oxide-semiconductor material.