Dual Gradient Managed Pressure Drilling Riser ECD Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In deep water off-shore drilling, single gradient drilling fluids struggle to maintain pressure control within the drilling window due to dual gradient effects, leading to instability and potential wellbore issues.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of dual gradient managed pressure drilling, where a lifting fluid with a lower density than the drilling fluid is mixed with returns and injected into the system, creating a return mixture that flows through a pressure control assembly, allowing for real-time measurement and adjustment of flow rates to maintain optimal pressure control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single gradient drilling fluid is used, then the drilling operation can be simplified, but pressure control within the drilling window cannot be maintained due to dual gradient effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling fluid system complexityVSAvoidpressure control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The drilling fluid system is segmented into two distinct gradient zones: the upper riser section uses low-density lifting fluid while the lower wellbore section uses high-density drilling fluid. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized independently - the lifting fluid reduces ECD in the riser while the drilling fluid maintains pressure control in the wellbore, resolving the contradiction between system simplicity and pressure control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different fluid densities are applied to different locations within the drilling system. The lifting fluid with lower density is specifically applied in the riser section where ECD reduction is needed, while the drilling fluid with higher density is maintained in the wellbore where pressure control is critical. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each location's specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If lifting fluid is mixed with returns to create return mixture, then pressure control is improved, but the system complexity increases with additional injection points and flow control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control stabilityVSAvoidfluid injection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting fluid acts as an intermediary substance that modifies the properties of the drilling fluid returns. By injecting the lifting fluid into the returns stream, it serves as a mediator that reduces the overall density and ECD of the returning fluid without requiring complete system redesign. This intermediary approach improves pressure control while limiting complexity to the injection mechanism rather than the entire fluid system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates flow rate measurement and comparison mechanisms that provide feedback on the mixing ratio of lifting fluid and returns. This feedback loop allows automatic adjustment of injection rates to maintain optimal pressure control, improving reliability while the automation reduces the operational complexity of managing multiple injection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If dual gradient managed pressure drilling is implemented, then drilling window maintenance is achieved, but real-time measurement and adjustment requirements increase operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling window stabilityVSAvoidflow rate monitoring and adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to automatically monitor and adjust flow rates based on pre-established relationships between lifting fluid flow rate, returns flow rate, and resulting ECD. The automated control system performs self-adjustment without requiring constant manual intervention, maintaining drilling window stability while reducing operational complexity through automation rather than manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual flow rate measurement and adjustment operations are replaced with automated electronic measurement systems and control mechanisms. Sensors continuously monitor flow rates and the control system automatically adjusts injection rates, substituting mechanical/manual operations with automated systems that improve reliability while actually simplifying ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively stabilizes pressure control, preventing wellbore instability and allowing for safe and efficient drilling by compensating for dual gradient effects, thereby maintaining the drilling window and ensuring formation stability.

Implementation Method 1

The lifting fluid has a density substantially less than a density of the drilling fluid. The return mixture has a density substantially less than the drilling fluid density.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity gradient mixing: Density Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The subsea PCA comprises a mass flow meter. measuring a flow rate of the returns using the mass flow meter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass flow measurement:

Data Source

PatentEP2809871B1Dual gradient managed pressure drilling
Publication Date: 2018.07.11 WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • EP2809871B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2809871B1 patent drawingFigure 1B~1C
  • EP2809871B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

A method of drilling a subsea wellbore includes drilling the wellbore by injecting drilling fluid through a tubular string extending into the wellbore from an offshore drilling unit (ODU) and rotating a drill bit disposed on a bottom of the tubular string. The method further includes, while drilling the wellbore: mixing lifting fluid with drilling returns at a flow rate proportionate to a flow rate of the drilling fluid, thereby forming a return mixture. The lifting fluid has a density substantially less than a density of the drilling fluid. The return mixture has a density substantially less than the drilling fluid density. The method further includes, while drilling the wellbore: measuring a flow rate of the returns or the return mixture; and comparing the measured flow rate to the drilling fluid flow rate to ensure control of a formation being drilled.