Dual-Hand Training Device with Coupled Rotating Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional training devices primarily focus on arm muscle training, limiting the range of motion and failing to effectively engage the entire musculoskeletal system, including the torso and other muscle groups, thereby offering a limited and unvaried workout experience.

Innovation Solution

A dual-hand operated training device with two independent rotating devices, each with a handle, that can be actuated differently, and are rotationally coupled through gear wheels or a toothed belt, allowing for synchronized or asynchronous operation, enabling a wide range of movements that stress both arm and torso muscles, and can be adjusted for various directions and planes of rotation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single rotating mechanism is used for training, then the device structure is simple, but the range of motion and muscle engagement is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange of motionVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The training device is divided into two independent rotating mechanisms, each with its own handle and resistance device. This segmentation allows each mechanism to operate independently, providing varied ranges of motion and engaging different muscle groups, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplicity and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each rotating mechanism is designed to perform multiple functions: training arm muscles, engaging torso muscles through synchronized or asynchronous operation, and providing varied ranges of motion. This multi-functionality increases adaptability without requiring entirely separate devices for each training goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional training devices are used, then the device structure is simple, but the strain on muscles is unvaried

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemuscle strain varietyVSAvoidrotating mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates two rotating mechanisms that can operate dynamically in different modes: synchronously to engage torso muscles, asynchronously to focus on arm muscles, or independently to provide varied strain patterns. This dynamic operation capability increases muscle strain variety while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Each rotating mechanism has its own resistance device that can be independently adjusted to provide different levels of strain on specific muscle groups. This local quality adjustment allows for varied muscle strain without requiring complex overall device modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If both hands operate the same rotating mechanism, then the device structure is simple, but the operating possibilities are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating possibilitiesVSAvoidrotating mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the rotating mechanism into two independent units, each operable by one hand. This segmentation enables independent operation of each mechanism, allowing for synchronized or asynchronous hand movements and significantly increasing operating possibilities while maintaining structural simplicity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances muscle engagement across the entire body, providing a more comprehensive workout that includes the musculoskeletal system and mental aspects of movement coordination, increasing calorie consumption and effectively training Integrated Whole-Body Strength (IWBS), suitable for various sports and therapeutic applications.

Implementation Method 1

A rotational resistance device (15) which interacts with the rotary device (11, 13) in such a way that a rotational resistance is opposed to the rotational movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3335767B1Training device
Publication Date: 2019.06.19 PFLANZ GERO
  • EP3335767B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3335767B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3d
  • EP3335767B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b8

AI summary

A training or gymnastic device (10) can be operated by a user by a rotating motion with both hands. For this purpose, a first rotating mechanism (11) and a second rotating mechanism (13) are provided. Each of the first and second rotating mechanisms has a handle (21, 23) for the user to grasp and rotate. The first and second rotating mechanisms each interact with a rotational resistance device (15) and are rotationally coupled to each other.