Dual-Handle Actuation for Rod-Mounted Machine Tool Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing actuating devices for machine tools lack intuitive and safe operation, often leading to accidental activation of functions and inadequate user safety during stowage or transport.

Innovation Solution

An actuating device with multiple movement paths for different functions, including rotational and linear movements, designed to be operated by two hands, featuring a base unit, handle units, and a switching unit with electronic control, ensuring intuitive operation and enhanced safety through mechanical and electronic guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single handle unit with simple actuation is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to lack of intuitive control and increased risk of accidental activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitive operationVSAvoidactuating device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating device is segmented into two separate handle units (first handle unit and second handle unit) with distinct actuating elements. Each handle unit controls specific functions through different movement paths, providing intuitive and separate control mechanisms that reduce accidental activation while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If multiple actuating elements are added to control different functions, then the ease of operation improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each handle unit is designed with multi-functionality to control multiple machine tool functions. The first handle unit controls functions through rotational movement, while the second handle unit controls different functions through linear movement. This universal design allows comprehensive control without proportionally increasing the number of separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces different movement dimensions for different handle units - rotational movement for the first handle unit and linear movement for the second handle unit. This dimensional differentiation allows multiple functions to be controlled through distinct actuation paths, improving operational precision while managing complexity through spatial organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the actuating element can be easily moved for quick operation, then the productivity is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to increased risk of accidental activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation speedVSAvoidanti-accidental activation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating device is divided into two independent handle units that must be operated separately. This segmentation ensures that accidental activation of one handle does not trigger unintended functions, as each handle controls distinct operations. The separate control mechanisms maintain quick operation capability while enhancing reliability through independent control paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The switching unit acts as an intermediary between the handle units and the machine tool functions. It receives actuation signals from either handle unit and processes them through defined movement paths, ensuring that only intentional and properly directed actuation results in function activation. This intermediary mechanism prevents accidental activation while maintaining operational speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4019194B1Machine tool, actuating device for a machine tool, in particular a rod-mounted machine tool, method for operating the machine tool
Publication Date: 2025.10.22 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP4019194B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4019194B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4019194B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an actuating device for a machine tool (12a; 12b; 12c; 12d), in particular a pole pruner, comprising at least one, in particular at least partially designed as a housing (24a; 24d), at least substantially rod-shaped basic unit (22a; 22b; 22c; 22d), with at least two, in particular at least substantially coaxially arranged and spaced apart from one another, hand grip units (26a, 28a; 26d, 28d), each designed to be gripped at least largely by at least one hand of a user, wherein the two hand grip units (26a, 28a; 26d, 28d) are each arranged on the basic unit (22a; 22b; 22c; 22d) or are at least partially formed as part of the basic unit (22a; 22b; 22c; 22d). are, and with at least one switching unit (30a; 30b; 30c; 30d) to a control of at least one function of the machine tool (12a; 12b; 12c; 12d).It is proposed that at least one handle unit (26a; 26d) of the two handle units (26a, 28a; 26d, 28d) is designed as an actuating element (34a; 34d) of the switching unit (30a; 30b; 30c; 30d), in particular in a tube-like manner, enclosing the basic unit (22a; 22b; 22c; 22d), which is movably mounted relative to the basic unit (22a; 22b; 22c; 22d) and/or relative to another handle unit (28a; 28d) of the two handle units (26a, 28a; 26d, 28d) along at least two different movement paths (38a, 40a; 38b, 40b; 38c, 40c; 38d, 40d), wherein at least a motion path (38a; 38b; 38c; 38d) of a rotational movement, in particular about a longitudinal axis (42a; 42b; 42c; 42d) of the basic unit (22a; 22b; 22c; 22d) and/or about a longitudinal axis (44a; 44d) of the actuating element (34a; 34d).