Dual Haptic Actuation for Phase-Differentiated Aerosol Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aerosol generating devices provide limited and inefficient haptic feedback to users, lacking differentiation between phases of a vaping session and often consuming excessive energy.

Innovation Solution

The device employs two distinct haptic actuators, a more energy-efficient linear resonant actuator and a less efficient piezoelectric actuator, controlled to provide differentiated haptic feedback during various phases of a vaping session, optimizing user experience and energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single haptic actuator is used to provide feedback throughout the entire vaping session, then the device structure remains simple, but the user cannot differentiate between different phases of the vaping session and energy consumption is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase differentiation capabilityVSAvoidhaptic actuator configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vaping session is divided into distinct phases (heating phase and vaping phase), and different haptic actuators are assigned to different phases. The first haptic actuator operates during the heating phase while the second haptic actuator operates during the vaping phase, enabling phase differentiation through distinct tactile feedback characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The haptic feedback system dynamically switches between different actuators based on the current phase of the vaping session. The controller activates the first haptic actuator during the heating phase and switches to the second haptic actuator during the vaping phase, creating adaptive and context-appropriate feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a high-performance haptic actuator is used throughout the entire vaping session, then the user experiences consistent tactile feedback, but energy consumption increases unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedback consistencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback function is segmented across two different actuators, each optimized for specific phases. The first haptic actuator handles the heating phase while the second handles the vaping phase, allowing each actuator to operate only when needed and at optimal performance levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by switching between different actuator types based on phase requirements. During the heating phase, the first actuator provides appropriate feedback, then the system transitions to the second actuator for the vaping phase, optimizing energy consumption for each operational state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If differentiated haptic feedback is provided for different phases of the vaping session, then user experience is enhanced, but the device requires multiple haptic actuators increasing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidactuator system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback system is segmented into two distinct actuators, each responsible for specific phases of the vaping session. This segmentation enables differentiated tactile feedback that enhances user experience by providing phase-specific feedback characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves multiple functions by managing both haptic actuators and coordinating their operation across different phases. The system achieves multi-functionality where the haptic feedback subsystem can provide both heating-phase feedback and vaping-phase feedback through coordinated actuator operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances user differentiation between vaping session phases with optimized energy efficiency by using two haptic actuators, providing tailored tactile responses while reducing power consumption.

Implementation Method 1

Vibro-tactile feedback may be provided to the user of the device by using a vibration actuator to generate an oscillating or reciprocating motion of the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical vibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

a piezoelectric actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20260007185A1An aerosol generating device
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 JT INTERNATIONAL SA
  • US20260007185A1 patent drawing
  • US20260007185A1 patent drawing
  • US20260007185A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerosol generating device is described. The device is configured to atomise aerosol generating material to generate an aerosol for inhalation by a user, for example by heating the material or substrate. The device includes a first haptic actuator and a second haptic actuator. A controller of the device is configured to control the first and second haptic actuators to provide haptic feedback to the user during a vaping session.