Dual-Height Table Top Design for Rapid Seated-Standing Transitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional height-adjustable tables are not designed to facilitate frequent changes between seated and standing positions, leading to sedentary work habits and health issues, and they often require complex adjustments and occupy too much space, making them unsuitable for smaller offices.

Innovation Solution

A space-saving office table with two interconnected table tops, one for seated and one for standing, that are electrically height-adjustable, allowing users to switch between positions quickly without disturbing console obstructions, featuring a vertical suspension cross member and minimal height adjustment range to accommodate varying body sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional height-adjustable tables are used, then height adjustment is possible, but frequent changes between seated and standing positions are not facilitated, leading to sedentary work habits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of position changeVSAvoidactive working behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The table top is designed with dynamic height adjustment capability, allowing it to switch between at least two different working heights (seated and standing positions). The height adjustment device enables the table top to be dynamically repositioned from a first working height suitable for seated work to a second working height suitable for standing work, facilitating active working behavior and preventing sedentary habits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If complex height adjustment mechanisms are used, then height adjustment is achieved, but the device complexity increases and requires extensive adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of height adjustmentVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The height adjustment mechanism is segmented into discrete, predefined height positions rather than continuous adjustment. The table top can be positioned at at least two distinct working heights (seated and standing), which simplifies the adjustment mechanism while maintaining functionality. This segmentation reduces the complexity of the adjustment device compared to continuous variable-height systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The height adjustment device is designed to be user-operable without requiring complex external mechanisms. The device enables the table top to be easily repositioned between predefined heights through simple user action, making the system self-sufficient and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If traditional office table arrangements are used, then work equipment can be within reach, but the space occupied is excessive for smaller offices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of work equipmentVSAvoidspace occupied by table
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The table design utilizes the vertical dimension by implementing multiple working heights rather than expanding horizontally. By providing both seated and standing working positions within a single table footprint, the design accommodates multiple work modes without increasing the horizontal space occupied, thus solving the space constraint in smaller offices while maintaining equipment accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Area of stationary object

If single table top designs are used, then space is optimized, but the ability to switch between seated and standing positions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to different working positions
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The single table top is designed with dynamic height adjustment capability, allowing it to adapt between at least two different working heights. This enables the table to provide both seated and standing working positions using a single table top structure, maintaining space efficiency while achieving versatility in adapting to different working positions and user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The single table top serves multiple functions by being adjustable to different heights. It can function as both a seated working surface and a standing working surface, providing multi-functionality within a single table structure. This universal design allows one table to replace what would traditionally require multiple separate tables or configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240298790A1Height-adjustable multifunction table
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 AERIS GMBH
  • US20240298790A1 patent drawing
  • US20240298790A1 patent drawing
  • US20240298790A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a height-adjustable table (1), in particular an office table having a seated-working region and a standing-working region, wherein the table (1) has two table tops (T1, T2), which each have a left-hand and right-hand table side (LS1, RS1, LS2, RS2), a front table side (V) and a rear table side (R), wherein, as seen from the front table side (V), the table tops (T1, T2) are arranged one beside the other, wherein the two table tops (T1, T2) are arranged at two different working heights (A1, A2), in order to form the respective seated-working region and standing-working region, wherein the two table tops (T1, T2) are fastened at a fixed or variable distance apart from one another in the height direction H, and wherein the higher-level table top (T1) forms a table surface (TF1) which, as seen in the height direction, is arranged very much predominantly to almost completely alongside the table surface of the lower table top (T2).