Dual Hook Strap Attachment for Large Anchor Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing strap tensioning devices face limitations with S-hooks, J-hooks, and carabiners in terms of anchor capacity, structural vulnerability, and secure attachment, particularly when dealing with webbing and large diameter anchors, and require additional loops or D-rings for secure attachment.

Innovation Solution

A dual hook attachment device with spring-biased hooks that can be selectively attached to a sewn end loop, providing secure and robust attachment to fixed anchors without additional loops, and functioning as a static pulley, mimicking the convenience of S-hooks while avoiding the vulnerabilities of carabiners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If S-hooks are used for strap termination, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability is worsened due to structural vulnerability and inability to securely attach to large diameter anchors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the attachment function into two separate hooks instead of one S-shaped hook. Each hook independently engages with the anchor, providing redundancy and improved reliability while maintaining the simple S-hook operation style.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two hooks are nested within a single housing structure, creating a compact device that functions like a double-hook S-hook. The hooks are positioned one behind the other, allowing them to work together to secure the strap to large diameter anchors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If additional loops or D-rings are added to straps for secure attachment, then reliability is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device combines two hooks and their housing into a single integrated attachment device that replaces the need for separate loops or D-rings. This merging provides secure attachment capability while reducing the number of separate components the user must manage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The dual hook device serves multiple functions: it provides secure attachment to large diameter anchors, maintains simplicity of use like S-hooks, and eliminates the need for additional loops or D-rings. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by providing reliability without increasing user-facing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If carabiners with lock gates are used, then reliability is improved through secure locking, but structural vulnerability is worsened due to twisting action and side loading

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidstructural vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the locking function across two independent hooks rather than relying on a single lock gate mechanism. This distribution of function reduces the structural vulnerability to twisting and side loading that plagues carabiner designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device extracts the problematic lock gate mechanism from carabiners and replaces it with simple hook engagement. The hooks rely on their geometry and the housing structure for security rather than a separate locking component, eliminating the structural vulnerability to twisting forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If J-hooks with perpendicular orientation are used, then anchor capacity is improved, but ease of operation is worsened compared to S-hooks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchor capacityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses symmetric S-shaped hooks rather than the asymmetric J-hook design. This symmetry allows the hooks to be oriented parallel to the strap plane like traditional S-hooks, maintaining ease of operation while the dual-hook configuration provides the anchor capacity of perpendicular orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device offers secure, reliable attachment to large diameter anchors, withstands torque and side loading, and allows strap movement without damage, maintaining structural integrity and load-bearing capacity, similar to S-hooks but with enhanced security and convenience.

Implementation Method 1

Two springs (170) are located internal to the housing (130) and bias the two hooks (110) toward a closed position (211).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP4334601B1Dual hook flat strap attachment device
Publication Date: 2026.04.15 NITE IZE INC
  • EP4334601B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4334601B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4334601B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An attachment device includes a first hook and a second hook, the first and second hook, the first and second hook biased towards each other and interconnected with each other, such the first and second hook have a first position, where a first curved end of the first hook does not touch a second curved end of the second hook and a second position, where the first curved end of the first hook does touch the second curved end of the second hook.