Dual Hopping Pattern System for Wireless Data Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data transmission systems using time and/or frequency hopping patterns face interference issues when multiple nodes transmit simultaneously, leading to overlapping and potential cancellation of data packets, particularly when the same hopping pattern is used by multiple nodes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual hopping pattern system where data is transmitted using a first hopping pattern and repeatedly using a second hopping pattern, with each pattern being a time or frequency hopping pattern, or a combination of both, to minimize overlap and interference by shifting and interleaving the patterns in time and frequency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the same time and/or frequency hopping pattern is used by multiple nodes for data transmission, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the transmission reliability deteriorates due to packet overlap and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the hopping pattern parameters by introducing a node-specific offset value that modifies the base hopping pattern. Each node calculates its unique hopping pattern by adding its offset to the base pattern, thereby differentiating their transmission patterns while maintaining a common base structure. This resolves the contradiction by preserving operational simplicity through the base pattern while ensuring transmission reliability through node-specific differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the hopping pattern into two components: a common base hopping pattern known to all nodes, and a node-specific offset component. This segmentation allows the system to maintain a simple common framework while introducing individual variations to prevent interference, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and transmission reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If multiple nodes transmit data simultaneously using the same hopping pattern, then the productivity of the communication system is improved, but the transmission reliability deteriorates due to interference and packet cancellation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the hopping pattern parameters by incorporating a node-specific offset that shifts the time and/or frequency positions of hops for each node. This parameter change allows multiple nodes to transmit simultaneously with differentiated patterns, preventing packet overlap and interference while maintaining high system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry into the otherwise symmetric hopping pattern by adding node-specific offsets. Each node's transmission pattern becomes asymmetric relative to others, with unique time-frequency positioning that prevents collision while allowing simultaneous transmission, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of operation

If global time and frequency hopping patterns are defined for all participants, then the ease of operation is improved and coordination is simplified, but the transmission reliability deteriorates when multiple nodes use identical patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the hopping pattern parameters by adding a node-specific offset to the global base pattern. This allows all nodes to operate from the same global reference (maintaining ease of operation) while each node's actual transmission pattern is differentiated through parameter modification (ensuring reliability).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The global base hopping pattern serves as an intermediary framework that coordinates all nodes, while node-specific offsets act as mediators that differentiate individual transmissions. This two-level structure maintains the benefits of global coordination while preventing interference through local differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3846376B1Specific jump patterns for repeated transmission and reception of data
Publication Date: 2024.03.27 FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV
  • EP3846376B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3846376B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3846376B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In exemplary embodiments, data transmitters and data receivers use a first jump pattern and a second jump pattern in a first mode for repeated data transmission, and a third jump pattern in a second mode for single data transmission, wherein the jump patterns of the first mode and the second mode are different, so that the probability of collision during simultaneous data transmission by another data transmitter in a different mode can be reduced, thus increasing transmission reliability.