Dual Impeller Toner Classification Device for Particle Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional classification devices, such as tandem toner separators, face issues with accurately classifying toner particles by size, leading to poor heat-resistant storage stability, background fouling, filming, and reduced yield due to adhesion and fusion of toner particles, especially when trying to remove particles with a diameter of 2 μm or less.

Innovation Solution

The proposed classification device features two impeller-type rotors with differently sized penetration holes at their ends, allowing for controlled centrifugal and centripetal forces to efficiently separate toner particles, reducing adhesion and improving classification accuracy and yield by maintaining a gap between the rotors and optimizing the design of the classification space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional classification devices are used to remove fine particles, then particle size classification is performed, but desired-size particles are also removed along with fine particles causing reduced yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size classification accuracyVSAvoidtoner yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The classification device is divided into two independent classification rotors with different centrifugal forces. The first classification rotor removes fine particles (2 μm or less) while the second classification rotor removes coarse particles (4 μm or more). This segmentation allows selective removal of unwanted particles without removing desired-size particles, thereby improving both classification accuracy and toner yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each classification rotor is designed with different local characteristics - different rotor diameters, rotation speeds, and penetration hole sizes - to create different centrifugal forces. The first rotor has higher centrifugal force for removing fine particles, while the second rotor has lower centrifugal force for removing coarse particles. This local quality differentiation enables precise particle size classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If high centrifugal force is applied to remove fine particles, then classification efficiency is improved, but adhesion and fusion of toner particles occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification efficiencyVSAvoidadhesion and fusion of toner particles
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful adhesion effect is segmented and localized to specific rotors. The first classification rotor operates at high speed to remove fine particles, while the second classification rotor operates at lower speed to remove coarse particles. By segmenting the classification process, the harmful adhesion effect is limited to the first rotor while the second rotor operates under conditions that prevent adhesion, thereby maintaining overall classification efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesion effect, which is normally harmful, is converted into a beneficial separation mechanism. By carefully controlling the centrifugal force in the second classification rotor, toner particles that would otherwise adhere to the rotor surface are instead selectively removed as coarse particles. This converts the potential harm of adhesion into a useful particle removal mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Manufacturing precision

If rotor speed is increased to improve classification accuracy, then particle size separation is enhanced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size separation accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The energy consumption is segmented across two rotors with different speed requirements. The first classification rotor operates at high speed to achieve accurate removal of fine particles, while the second classification rotor operates at lower speed for removing coarse particles. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high classification accuracy for fine particles without requiring both rotors to operate at high speed, thereby reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of different rotors to optimize energy consumption. By setting different rotation speeds, rotor diameters, and penetration hole sizes for the two rotors, the system achieves efficient particle size separation without requiring excessive energy. The parameter optimization allows accurate classification while minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables precise classification of toner particles, preventing the removal of desired-size particles and reducing adhesion, thereby enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of toner classification while maintaining high yield and preventing toner fouling.

Implementation Method 1

A typical TTSP performs classification by balancing centrifugal force generated from blades provided on a rotor and centripetal force generated from fan suction force of the rotor. The centrifugal force collects coarse particles, whereas the centripetal force collects fine particles from the periphery of the rotor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS8757387B2Classification device
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 RICOH CO LTD
  • US8757387B2 patent drawing
  • US8757387B2 patent drawing
  • US8757387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A classification device for classifying particles by size including an upper impeller-type rotor, a first end of which is covered with a cover disc without penetration hole and a second end of which is covered with an upper cover disc with a penetration hole; and a lower impeller-type rotor, a first end of which is covered with a cover disc without penetration hole and a second end of which is covered with a lower cover disc with a penetration hole. The upper impeller-type rotor and the lower impeller-type rotor are provided so that axes thereof are coincident and the first ends face with each other forming a gap therebetween in an axial direction, and the diameters of the penetration holes of the upper cover disc and the lower cover disc are different.