Dual Inductance Structure for Reducing Mutual Inductance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing miniaturized bandpass filters face challenges in reducing size while maintaining mutual and self-inductance values, leading to increased circuit layout area and occupied space in electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

A dual inductance structure comprising a substrate with interconnected first and second inductance elements and a grounding element, where the grounding element separates the inductance elements to minimize mutual inductance, allowing for reduction in conductor lengths and area without increasing distance, thereby reducing the overall size of the electronic device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the distance between conductors is increased to reduce mutual inductance, then mutual inductance value is reduced, but circuit layout area is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutual inductance controlVSAvoidcircuit layout area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

A grounding element is introduced as an intermediary between the first and second inductance elements. This grounding element acts as a mediator to control and reduce the mutual inductance between the two inductors without requiring increased separation distance, thereby maintaining compact circuit layout while achieving desired mutual inductance reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The grounding element changes the electromagnetic field distribution and coupling parameters between the conductors. By introducing this intermediate grounding structure, the mutual inductance parameter is modified without changing the physical distance between inductance elements, thus reducing mutual inductance while maintaining compact area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If conductor length is reduced to minimize area, then layout area is reduced, but maintaining self-inductance value becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout areaVSAvoidself-inductance value
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inductance elements utilize three-dimensional spatial arrangement with grounding elements positioned at different vertical layers (first grounding portion between first and third conductors, second grounding portion between second and fourth conductors). This dimensional approach allows maintaining self-inductance values with shorter conductors by utilizing vertical space for electromagnetic field confinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If multiple grounding portions are added to control mutual inductance, then mutual inductance is reduced, but device complexity is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutual inductance reductionVSAvoidgrounding structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple grounding portions are merged into a single integrated grounding element structure. The first grounding portion and second grounding portion are combined in one grounding element, simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining the mutual inductance reduction effect. This unified approach avoids the complexity of separate grounding structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual inductance structure effectively reduces the mutual inductance value by shortening conductor lengths, minimizing the circuit layout area and enhancing the compactness and portability of electronic devices while maintaining self-inductance values.

Implementation Method 1

The inductance L1 and the inductance L2 have the effect of mutual inductance. As we may know that the smaller the distance W1 is separated the larger the mutual inductance is induced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMutual inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the conductor 102 can be equivalent to an inductance L1, and the conductor 104 can be equivalent to an inductance L2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7808357B2Dual inductance structure
Publication Date: 2010.10.05 ADVANCED SEMICON ENG INC
  • US7808357B2 patent drawing
  • US7808357B2 patent drawing
  • US7808357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dual inductance structure including a substrate, a first inductance element, a second inductance element and a grounding element is provided. The substrate has a layout layer and a grounding layer. The first inductance element has a first and a second conductor. The second inductance element has a third and a fourth conductor. The grounding element has a first and a second grounding portion. The first grounding portion is on the grounding layer and located at an area between the first conductor and the third conductor. At least a part of the second grounding portion is on the grounding layer and located at an area between the first conductor and the second conductor. At least another part of the second grounding portion is on the grounding layer and located at an area between the third conductor and the fourth conductor.