Dual Inhibiting Mechanism for Handheld Power Tool Ergonomics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing handheld work apparatuses with drive motors face ergonomic and operational challenges due to the need for continuous actuation of inhibitors, leading to unintentional actuation and additional operator steps.

Innovation Solution

A dual inhibiting device system where both devices must be in their released state for operation, with a locking mechanism that maintains the first device's enabled state when the second is actuated, allowing the first device to be released, and a blocking device that requires a specific sequence for enabling, ensuring both are disabled when the apparatus is put down.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single inhibitor is used to prevent unintentional actuation, then safety is improved, but operational complexity increases as the operator must continuously hold or actively reset the inhibitor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of unintentional actuationVSAvoidoperator effort and continuous attention
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The single inhibitor is divided into two separate inhibitors (first and second inhibitors). Each inhibitor independently contributes to preventing unintentional actuation, while the segmentation allows the system to achieve safety without requiring continuous operator attention. The first inhibitor can be passively held in its position by the second inhibitor, reducing the operator's continuous effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second inhibitor automatically holds the first inhibitor in its actuated position through the locking device, eliminating the need for the operator to continuously hold or actively reset the first inhibitor. This self-service mechanism reduces operational complexity and improves ease of use while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple inhibiting devices are provided to ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of unintentional actuationVSAvoidnumber of inhibiting devices and control steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The two inhibitors are merged into a coordinated system where the second inhibitor serves dual functions: it acts as an independent safety inhibitor and simultaneously locks the first inhibitor in its actuated position through the locking device. This merging reduces the number of separate control mechanisms needed while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking device is pre-configured to automatically lock the first inhibitor when the second inhibitor is actuated. This preliminary action ensures that both inhibitors work together seamlessly without requiring complex control logic or additional operating steps from the operator, thus limiting device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the first inhibitor is locked in enabled state, then ease of operation is improved by reducing continuous actuation, but reliability may worsen if the locking mechanism fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of continuous actuationVSAvoiddependence on locking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a blocking device that prevents the second inhibitor from being actuated unless the first inhibitor is already in its actuated position. This beforehand cushioning ensures that the locking mechanism only engages under controlled conditions, reducing the risk of unintended locking and maintaining reliability while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking device provides mechanical feedback by physically preventing the first inhibitor from returning to its initial position once locked by the second inhibitor. This feedback mechanism ensures that the system state is clearly defined and prevents erroneous states, maintaining reliability while enabling the ease of operation benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9636792B2Handheld work apparatus having a drive motor for driving a work tool and method for operating said apparatus
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO KG
  • US9636792B2 patent drawing
  • US9636792B2 patent drawing
  • US9636792B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A handheld work apparatus has a drive motor for driving a tool, an operating element for operating the drive motor, a first inhibiting unit and a second inhibiting unit. Each inhibiting unit has a disable state and an enable state. The operating element is inhibited for operating the drive motor when at least one of the inhibiting units is in its disable state. The work apparatus further has a locking device which locks the first inhibiting unit in its enable state if the second inhibiting unit is in its enable state. A method for operating the work apparatus provides that the first inhibiting unit is locked in its enable state when the first inhibiting unit and the second inhibiting unit are situated in their enable states at the same time.