Dual-Input Pressure Valve for Glaucoma Drainage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current glaucoma treatments using passive drainage devices in ophthalmic treatments lack smart, interactive control over fluid flow, leading to increased resistance due to fibrosis and bleb formation, which reduces the effectiveness in managing intraocular pressure (IOP).

Innovation Solution

A pressure-driven valve system with deflectable membranes that adjusts fluid flow based on pressure differentials between the anterior chamber, atmospheric pressure, and the drainage site, allowing for active control of aqueous humor drainage without external power or electronic feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If passive drainage devices are used, then the device structure is simple, but the control over fluid flow is insufficient leading to increased resistance due to fibrosis and bleb formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over fluid flowVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dual-input pressure-driven valve system where a deflectable membrane dynamically adjusts the valve aperture based on real-time pressure differentials between the anterior chamber and drainage site. This dynamic mechanism allows the valve to automatically adapt to changing flow conditions and fibrotic resistance, providing smart control without complex electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The valve system utilizes the natural pressure differentials existing in the eye's drainage system to drive membrane deflection and regulate flow. The system is self-regulating, using the pressure gradient between the anterior chamber (higher pressure) and drainage site (lower pressure) to automatically adjust the valve opening, eliminating the need for external power sources or electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If passive drainage devices are used, then the device complexity is low, but the effectiveness in managing IOP decreases over time due to fibrosis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness in managing IOPVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-input pressure-driven valve incorporates a feedback mechanism where the membrane deflection is continuously influenced by the pressure differential between the anterior chamber and drainage site. As fibrosis increases resistance and alters pressure conditions, the membrane automatically adjusts the valve aperture to maintain optimal flow, providing continuous feedback-based regulation that adapts to long-term changes in the drainage system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The valve system transitions from a static passive device to a dynamic active system where the membrane continuously adjusts the aperture based on real-time pressure conditions. This dynamic adaptation ensures the valve maintains effectiveness over time by responding to changes in fibrotic resistance and pressure gradients, preventing the decline in performance seen with passive devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If active control of fluid flow is implemented, then the regulation of IOP is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation of IOPVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure-driven valve system is entirely self-regulating, using the natural pressure differentials in the eye to drive membrane deflection and control flow. The higher pressure in the anterior chamber relative to the drainage site automatically causes the membrane to deflect and open the valve aperture, allowing aqueous humor to flow. This self-service mechanism provides active IOP regulation without requiring external power sources, electronics, or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The valve system utilizes pneumatic principles where pressure differentials drive the mechanical deflection of the membrane. The pressure gradient between the anterior chamber and drainage site creates a force that deflects the membrane and regulates the valve aperture, converting pressure energy into mechanical motion for flow control without requiring electronic actuators or external power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Adaptability or versatility

If passive drainage devices are used, then the manufacturing is simple, but the device cannot adapt to changing pressure conditions leading to under-drainage or over-drainage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to pressure conditionsVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-input pressure-driven valve employs a dynamic membrane that continuously adjusts the valve aperture in response to changing pressure differentials between the anterior chamber and drainage site. This dynamic mechanism allows the device to adapt to varying pressure conditions, preventing both under-drainage (when pressure differential is low) and over-drainage (when pressure differential is high), whereas passive devices with fixed apertures cannot respond to such changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively regulates IOP by dynamically controlling fluid flow, reducing bleb formation and fibrosis, thereby maintaining optimal eye pressure and preventing both under-drainage and over-drainage complications.

Implementation Method 1

The deflectable membrane is configured to deflect in response to pressure differentials between the anterior chamber, atmospheric pressure, and the drainage site

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9622910B2Active drainage systems with dual-input pressure-driven values
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 ALCON INC
  • US9622910B2 patent drawing
  • US9622910B2 patent drawing
  • US9622910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure-driven valve is disclosed. The valve includes a housing, a fluid flow channel, and a deflectable portion. The housing comprises a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet. The fluid flow channel extends between the fluid inlet and the fluid outlet. The deflectable portion is disposed within the housing, and defines a portion of the fluid flow channel. The deflectable portion is configured to deflect to increase and decrease a size of the fluid flow channel to regulate fluid flow from the fluid inlet to the fluid outlet. The deflectable portion is disposed and arranged to deflect as a result of pressure differentials between a reference pressure, a fluid flow channel pressure, and an outlet pressure representative of fluid pressure at the fluid outlet.