Dual-Interface Rail Accessory for Cross-Compatible Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rail systems in healthcare environments require users to purchase accessories that are specific to the installed system, leading to increased costs when incompatible equipment needs retrofitting or replacement.

Innovation Solution

A rail accessory system with a medial body and dual arms that support multiple rail interfaces, allowing for the attachment of accessories compatible with different rail systems, such as modular and Fairfield styles, without the need for retrofitting or replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a rail system is designed with a single specific interface type, then the structural design is simplified and manufacturing is easier, but the adaptability to different accessories is reduced and costs increase when retrofitting is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different rail interfacesVSAvoidstructural complexity of rail accessory system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rail accessory system is designed with dual arm configurations that can accommodate multiple rail interface types (modular and Fairfield styles) simultaneously. The arms feature different interface geometries allowing a single system to serve multiple functions and be compatible with various accessory types, thereby improving adaptability without requiring separate systems for each interface standard

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If accessories are made specific to a particular rail system, then the ease of manufacture and installation is improved, but the loss of time and increased costs occur when incompatible equipment needs replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of accessory attachmentVSAvoidtime for retrofitting or replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The accessory system incorporates multiple interface types in a single design, allowing accessories to be manufactured with universal compatibility. This eliminates the need for time-consuming retrofitting or replacement operations when upgrading or changing equipment, as the dual-interface design accommodates both modular and Fairfield style rails natively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a rail system supports multiple interface types, then the adaptability and cost-effectiveness is improved, but the manufacturing precision and production complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for multiple rail interface typesVSAvoidprecision required for multiple interface geometries
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rail accessory system divides the interface accommodation into separate arm components, with each arm configured for specific interface types. This segmentation allows manufacturing processes to focus on precise fabrication of individual interface geometries rather than attempting to create a fully integrated multi-interface structure, thereby managing manufacturing precision requirements more effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12486945B2Rail accessory system with different rail interfaces and related methods
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 PALADIN HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US12486945B2 patent drawing
  • US12486945B2 patent drawing
  • US12486945B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rail accessory system includes a medial body to be attached to a wall, and a first arm extending transversely from the medial body and away from the wall, the first arm having an inner surface, and an outer surface opposite the inner surface. The rail accessory system also includes a second arm extending transversely from the medial body and away from the wall. The second arm has an inner surface facing the inner surface of the first arm, and an outer surface opposite the inner surface of the second arm. The inner surfaces of the first and second arms define a first different rail interface. The outer surfaces of the first and second arms define a second different rail interface.