Dual Joystick Cargo Loading Control System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft cargo loading systems face difficulties in loading large or non-standard cargo due to limited doorway width and the use of single-axis binary joystick controls, which restricts the precision and efficiency of cargo manipulation within the cargo hold.

Innovation Solution

A cargo loading system utilizing dual non-binary joysticks to control power drive units (PDUs) within the cargo hold, where the joysticks' displacement translates into throttle and directional control, allowing for precise manipulation and partitioning of the cargo hold based on the cargo's centroid and optical sensor detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single binary joystick is used to control cargo loading, then the control system is simple, but the precision and granularity of cargo manipulation is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of cargo manipulationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single 2-axis binary joystick to a dual joystick system where each joystick provides continuous multi-axis control. This dimensional expansion in control inputs enables precise manipulation of cargo position, orientation, and movement speed, directly resolving the precision limitation while accepting increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system evolves from static binary on/off switches to dynamic continuous control where joystick displacement magnitude directly correlates with cargo manipulation intensity. This dynamic control allows operators to precisely adjust cargo movement in real-time, achieving fine-grained control over loading operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If manual loading methods are used, then equipment complexity is low, but loading efficiency and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo loading efficiencyVSAvoidloading system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates optical sensors that automatically detect cargo position and provide feedback to the control system. This self-service capability enables the system to autonomously track and respond to cargo location, reducing the need for manual intervention and significantly improving loading efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The integration of optical sensors creates a closed-loop feedback system where cargo position is continuously monitored and used to adjust control responses. This real-time feedback mechanism enhances loading precision and speed, directly boosting productivity while the complexity remains justified by the performance gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the cargo hold is treated as a single undivided space, then the system is simple to operate, but handling non-standard and large cargo is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle non-standard cargoVSAvoidsystem control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cargo hold is virtually segmented into multiple zones using the dual joystick control system, allowing operators to independently control different regions of the cargo space. This segmentation enables precise positioning of non-standard cargo items and facilitates complex loading arrangements that adapt to various cargo dimensions and shapes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual joystick control system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it controls cargo movement in multiple directions, adjusts manipulation force, and coordinates with optical sensors for automatic positioning. This multi-functionality makes the system highly adaptable to diverse cargo types while the integrated control architecture keeps operational complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3075651B1Multi directional input cargo moving system
Publication Date: 2018.10.10 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3075651B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3075651B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3075651B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cargo loading system may comprise a non-transitory memory communicating with a processor, the non-transitory memory having instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations. The operations may comprise partitioning a cargo hold into a forward partition and an aft partition, reading a first input from a first joystick 136 and a second input from a second joystick 138, mapping the first input to a first power drive unit (PDU) 132 in the forward partition, and mapping the second input to a second PDU 134 in the aft partition.