Dual Kitchen Worktop Layout With Adjustable Meal-Table Height

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing kitchen worktop solutions are suboptimal as they either restrict functionality or compromise on height, failing to provide versatile usability for both work and meal preparation in confined spaces, especially when trying to accommodate different user heights and activities.

Innovation Solution

A dual worktop system where the first worktop is accessible from the front and the second worktop is accessible from both sides, allowing for height adjustment via a motorized mechanism, enabling versatile use as an extension, separate work surface, or meal table, with the ability to be lowered or raised to adapt to various needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed height worktop is used, then the structure is simple, but the ergonomics and adaptability to different user heights are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different user heightsVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The worktop is divided into two separate worktops (first worktop and second worktop) that can be independently adjusted in height. This segmentation allows each worktop to be optimized for different activities and user heights without requiring the entire structure to be complex, as only the necessary portions are made adjustable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The worktops are made dynamically adjustable in height through motorized mechanisms. The first worktop can be adjusted to a first height and the second worktop to a second height, allowing the system to adapt to different ergonomic requirements while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the second worktop is lowered below the first worktop level, then meal taking functionality is improved, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultifunctional usabilityVSAvoidheight adjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second worktop is designed to serve multiple functions: it can be positioned at the same level as the first worktop to extend the work surface, lowered below to create a table-height surface for meal taking, or raised above for standing activities. This multi-functionality is achieved through independent height adjustment mechanisms that allow the second worktop to adapt to different usage scenarios without requiring separate structures for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the second worktop is made accessible from both sides, then versatility is improved, but the footspace becomes more restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility from multiple sidesVSAvoidfootspace area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The second worktop is positioned and configured to be accessible from multiple sides including the rear side, utilizing three-dimensional space more efficiently. By allowing access from both front and rear sides, the design creates versatile usage possibilities without significantly increasing the footprint, as the worktop extends in the vertical and depth dimensions rather than requiring additional horizontal footspace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP1935283B1Kitchen furniture
Publication Date: 2013.07.24 RESCH RICHARD
  • EP1935283B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1935283B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP1935283B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The kitchen furniture has a rectangular work plate (1) in which kitchen equipments are arranged. The work plate has a front edge, and a rear edge over which the kitchen equipments are accessible. Another work plate (2) is vertically adjustable opposite to the plate (1), and has a working edge that is opposite the plate (1). The plate (2) is attached to the plate (1), and is lowered under the height of the plate (1) and raised over the height of the plate (1). The front and rear edges of the plate (1) and the working edge of the plate (2) are parallel to each other.