Dual-Layer Foam Cranial Protection Cell for Rotational Injury
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current helmets are inadequate in preventing deceleration injuries, particularly Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI), as they generate excessive angular acceleration, increase torque, and fail to absorb impact energy effectively, leading to increased risk of brain injuries and helmet weight.
Innovation Solution
A Cranial Protection Cell (CPC) with a dual foam layer system, where a low resilient viscoelastic inner layer and a rigid or semi-rigid outer layer with cavities work together to absorb impact, reduce torque, and increase deformation time, combined with a chin guard and visor design for enhanced protection and retention.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Object-affected harmful factors
If current helmets use traditional single-layer foam structures, then they provide basic impact protection, but they generate excessive angular acceleration and torque causing diffuse axonal injury
Solution Approach 1:
The impact absorbing means is divided into multiple foam layers with different densities and mechanical properties. The first foam layer has higher density and rigidity to resist initial impact forces, while the second foam layer has lower density and higher compliance to absorb residual energy and reduce angular acceleration. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function in the impact sequence.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention uses composite foam structures combining different materials with complementary properties. The first foam layer uses higher density material (e.g., expanded polystyrene or polyurethane foam with density 30-80 kg/m³) for initial impact resistance, while the second foam layer uses lower density material (e.g., expanded polystyrene or polyurethane foam with density 10-30 kg/m³) for energy absorption and torque reduction. This composite approach creates a gradient that effectively manages impact forces.
2Loss of energy
If helmets increase foam layer thickness to absorb more impact energy, then protection improves, but helmet weight and size increase
Solution Approach 1:
Different regions of the helmet have different foam layer configurations optimized for local impact characteristics. The frontal and lateral regions use thicker first foam layers for high-impact areas, while the rear and occipital regions use thinner configurations. The second foam layer is strategically positioned to provide torque absorption where needed most, creating a non-uniform distribution that optimizes protection-to-weight ratio.
Solution Approach 2:
The use of composite foam layers with different densities allows efficient energy absorption without requiring uniform thick coverage. The higher density first layer provides structural integrity and initial energy absorption, while the lower density second layer provides compliant energy dissipation. This composite structure achieves superior energy absorption per unit volume and weight compared to single-layer alternatives.
3Strength
If helmets use rigid shells for protection, then skull protection improves, but rotational force transmission increases causing brain injuries
Solution Approach 1:
The multi-layer foam structure serves as an intermediary between the rigid shell and the skull. The first foam layer acts as a primary mediator to resist direct impact forces transmitted to the skull, while the second foam layer acts as a secondary mediator to absorb rotational forces and reduce torque on the brain. This intermediary structure decouples the protective function of the rigid shell from the harmful transmission of rotational forces.
Solution Approach 2:
The composite foam structure combines materials with different mechanical properties to create a gradient that transitions from rigid (first layer) to compliant (second layer). This composite construction allows the shell's rigidity to provide skull protection while the foam layers progressively absorb and dissipate rotational forces before they reach the brain, preventing diffuse axonal injury.
4Weight of moving object
If helmets reduce foam density to decrease weight, then helmet weight decreases, but impact absorption capability deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The impact absorption function is segmented across two foam layers with different density characteristics. The first foam layer uses higher density material (30-80 kg/m³) to provide structural support and initial impact resistance, contributing more to weight but also more to energy absorption. The second foam layer uses lower density material (10-30 kg/m³) to provide compliant energy dissipation with less weight contribution. This segmentation allows optimized weight-to-protection ratio.
Solution Approach 2:
The composite foam construction combines higher density and lower density materials in a coordinated arrangement where each material contributes its strengths. The higher density first layer provides rigidity and initial energy absorption, while the lower density second layer provides weight efficiency and compliant energy dissipation. Together they achieve superior impact absorption per unit weight compared to using single-density foam throughout.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The CPC design reduces the risk of DAI, minimizes helmet weight and size, enhances facial protection, and improves aerodynamic efficiency by distributing force and increasing impact time, thereby providing better protection against rotational forces and reducing the likelihood of helmet detachment during impacts.
Implementation Method 1
a low resilient viscoelastic foam layer (22)
Implementation Method 2
a rigid or semi-rigid foam layer (21) with a plurality of cavities (24)
Data Source
AI summary
IMPROVEMENTS INTRODUCED IN A CRANIAL PROTECTION CELL, formed by an outer shell (11, 20) internally coated by absorbent material (12, 12′), said material comprising a first layer (21) immediately below the shell, of closed cell foam, rigid or semi-rigid in contact with a second layer (22) of open cell viscoelastic foam, the interface between said first and second layers being provided with interdigitations comprising cavities (24) in said first layer in which protrusions (23), provided in said second layer, fit in a complementary and cooperative manner. Absorbent supporting material are further provided in the jaw region (32), maxillary regions (33, 34) and mastoid regions. When closed, the visor (37) is embedded in the corresponding opening of the cranial protection cell, and its opening occurs in two steps, the former comprising forward movement, and the latter upward rotation. The cranial protection cell (CPC) further comprises a removable chin guard (54) whose unlocking mechanism is driven by buttons (51) located on either side of the shell.


