Dual-Layer Leaching Protector for Shooting Ranges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing leaching protectors for outdoor shooting ranges are inefficient due to uncontrolled leaching of lead and contaminants from ammunition, and the need for frequent replacement of the elastic covering layer, which is uneconomical and affected by precipitation and freezing conditions.

Innovation Solution

A dual-layer covering arrangement with a security layer and a firing layer, where the security layer is made of a durable material for infrequent penetrations and the firing layer is made of an elastic material for frequent penetrations, allowing for separate replacement and improved resistance to outdoor conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single elastic covering layer is used for the entire shooting range surface, then the layer can be replaced uniformly, but the cost and effort increase significantly when only part of the layer is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of replacementVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The covering layer is divided into two separate functional layers: a security layer for areas with low projectile penetration probability and a firing layer for areas with high penetration probability. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized independently and replaced separately based on actual wear and damage conditions, avoiding the waste of replacing entire undamaged sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different materials are used for different layers based on their specific functional requirements. The security layer uses a durable material suitable for infrequent penetrations, while the firing layer uses an elastic material optimized for frequent penetrations. This local quality approach ensures each layer performs its specific function optimally while allowing selective replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the covering layer is made of elastic material to minimize entry holes, then projectile penetration is reduced, but the layer must be frequently replaced when damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprojectile arrest effectivenessVSAvoidservice life of covering layer
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The covering system is segmented into two layers with different material properties and service lifetimes. The firing layer made of elastic material provides reliable projectile arrest with minimal entry holes but has a shorter service life requiring frequent replacement. The security layer made of durable material has a longer service life and is replaced less frequently, overall reducing material waste while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The elastic material is applied locally only where frequent projectile penetrations occur (firing layer), while durable material is used where penetrations are infrequent (security layer). This local quality approach optimizes the balance between reliability and service life by matching material properties to actual usage conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the covering layer is made of durable material to resist outdoor conditions, then weather resistance is improved, but the material is less effective at minimizing entry holes from projectile penetration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweather resistanceVSAvoidprojectile arrest effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different material properties are assigned to different layers based on their exposure to harmful factors and projectile penetration. The security layer exposed to weather uses durable material for weather resistance, while the firing layer experiencing frequent penetrations uses elastic material for projectile arrest effectiveness. This local quality approach resolves the contradiction by optimizing each layer for its primary function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The covering system is segmented so that the security layer handles weather exposure with durable material, while the firing layer handles projectile penetration with elastic material. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized for its specific function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If the entire covering layer is replaced when damaged, then the shooting range maintains full protection, but the cost and resource consumption increase unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The covering layer is segmented into two independently replaceable layers. When damage occurs, only the affected layer needs to be replaced rather than the entire covering system. This segmentation maintains full protection effectiveness while significantly reducing material consumption and replacement costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The segmented layer structure enables selective discarding and replacement of only the damaged layer while recovering and retaining the undamaged layer. This approach maintains protection effectiveness while minimizing material consumption by avoiding replacement of functional portions of the covering system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS10066909B2Leaching protector for outdoor shooting ranges
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 STAPP INT
  • US10066909B2 patent drawing
  • US10066909B2 patent drawing
  • US10066909B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The object of the present invention is to provide a leaching protector at outdoor shooting ranges comprising an elastic covering layer arrangement (100), a projectile-arresting material and a drainage arrangement. The covering layer arrangement (100) comprises a security layer (101) covering a security area (110) having a low probability of being penetrated by projectiles and a firing layer (102) covering a firing area (120) having a high probability of being penetrated by projectiles. The security layer (101) and the firing layer (102) are penetrable by projectiles. The security layer (101) is made of a first material and the firing layer (102) is made of a second material.