Dual-Layer Microphone Protection for Moisture and Particle Ingress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MEMS microphones are fragile and sensitive to dirt, debris, and liquid, lacking effective protection against particle and moisture ingress.

Innovation Solution

A dual-layer protective structure comprising a first outer layer with larger pores and lower acoustic impedance, and a second inner layer with smaller pores and higher acoustic impedance, coated with hydrophobic material, to provide enhanced protection for MEMS microphones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a protective layer is added to protect the MEMS microphone from particles and liquid, then protection against particle and moisture ingress is improved, but acoustic impedance increases and acoustic performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against particle and moisture ingressVSAvoidacoustic impedance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure is divided into two distinct layers: an outer layer with larger pores for particle filtration and an inner layer with smaller pores for liquid barrier protection. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized for its specific function while collectively providing comprehensive protection with controlled acoustic impedance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the protective structure have different pore sizes and acoustic impedance characteristics. The outer layer has larger pores with lower acoustic impedance for acoustic transmission, while the inner layer has smaller pores with higher acoustic impedance for liquid barrier function. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between protection and acoustic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the pore size of the protective layer is reduced to prevent particle ingress, then particle protection is improved, but acoustic transmission is blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle protectionVSAvoidacoustic transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protective function is segmented into two layers with different pore sizes. The outer layer with larger pores (e.g., 10-100 micrometers) allows acoustic transmission while providing first-level particle protection. The inner layer with smaller pores (e.g., 1-10 micrometers) provides enhanced particle filtration. This segmentation enables particle protection without blocking acoustic transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If a single protective layer is used to block liquid, then liquid protection is improved, but particle filtration and acoustic performance are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid protectionVSAvoidprotective structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single complex layer, the protective function is segmented into two simpler layers with distinct functions. The outer layer handles particle filtration and acoustic transmission, while the inner layer provides liquid barrier protection. This segmentation achieves comprehensive protection without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective structure uses a composite of two different porous materials with complementary properties. The outer layer material is optimized for acoustic transmission and particle filtration, while the inner layer material is optimized for liquid barrier properties. This composite approach provides multi-functional protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual-layer protection effectively prevents particle and liquid ingress while maintaining acoustic performance, ensuring stable operation of MEMS microphones.

Implementation Method 1

at least one of the first outer protective layer and the second inner protective layer comprises a hydrophobic coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic effect: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentEP3837856B1Two layer microphone protection
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 BOSE CORP
  • EP3837856B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3837856B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3837856B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure provide multi-layer microphone protection for any apparatus that captures sound. The apparatus includes an enclosure defining a first cavity. A microphone element is coupled to the first cavity. The microphone element comprises a microphone sensor and a microphone cavity. A first, outer protective layer is disposed at an outer end of the first cavity, closer to the external environment. A second, inner protective layer is disposed between an inner end of the first cavity and the microphone element. The second, inner protective layer may protect the microphone sensor from particles or liquids that may have passed through the first protective layer. The first and second layers may have different acoustic properties.