Dual Level Current Limit Apparatus for Wide Load Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fold back current limiters in DC power distribution systems are inefficient in reducing power dissipation across a wide range of load resistances, making them effective only for low load resistances.

Innovation Solution

A dual level current limit apparatus with an electronically controlled switch and control circuitry that alternately limits current based on the difference between a predetermined function of the current magnitude and a reference voltage, or the voltage across the load, allowing operation as both a fold back current limiter and a fixed reference current limiter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional fold back current limiters are used, then current limiting function is provided, but power dissipation is high across most load resistance ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidcurrent limiting effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic current limiting by switching between two operational modes: fold-back mode for low load resistances and fixed reference mode for high load resistances. The control circuitry automatically selects the appropriate mode based on real-time load conditions, optimizing power dissipation across the entire operating range while maintaining effective current limiting protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the current limiting parameter dynamically by using two different reference values: a fold-back reference voltage that varies with load current, and a fixed reference voltage. The control circuitry switches between these parameters based on load resistance, thereby optimizing power dissipation characteristics across different operating conditions while maintaining protection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fold back current limiting is applied, then protection during fault states is provided, but efficiency deteriorates for high load resistances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault state protectionVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its current limiting behavior by switching between fold-back mode (for fault protection at low resistances) and fixed reference mode (for efficient operation at high resistances). This dynamic adaptation ensures both fault protection and operational efficiency are maintained across the full range of load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuitry changes the reference parameter based on operating conditions: using a dynamic fold-back reference voltage when fault protection is needed (low load resistance) and a fixed reference voltage when efficiency is prioritized (high load resistance). This parameter switching resolves the contradiction between protection and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single current limiting mode is used, then circuit simplicity is maintained, but performance across wide load resistance range is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit structureVSAvoidload resistance adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal current limiting apparatus that performs multiple functions: fold-back current limiting for fault protection and fixed reference current limiting for efficient operation. The control circuitry integrates both modes into a single device, enabling it to adapt to various load resistance ranges while maintaining reasonable circuit complexity through shared components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The current limiting function is segmented into two distinct modes handled by separate control pathways within the control circuitry. One pathway implements fold-back limiting using a dynamic reference voltage, while the other implements fixed reference limiting. The segmentation allows each mode to be optimized independently while being coordinated through the control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10075062B2Dual level current limit apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 MICROSEMI CORP
  • US10075062B2 patent drawing
  • US10075062B2 patent drawing
  • US10075062B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dual level current limit apparatus constituted of: an electronically controlled switch coupled between a load and a line voltage; and a control circuitry arranged to alternately: control said electronically controlled switch to limit the magnitude of current flowing therethrough responsive to the difference between a predetermined first function of the current magnitude and a predetermined reference voltage, and control said electronically controlled switch to limit the magnitude of current flowing therethrough responsive to the difference between said first function of the current magnitude and a predetermined second function of the load voltage.