Dual-Loop LDO Regulator Gating for Low-Voltage Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voltage regulators struggle with high power consumption and inefficiency when operating at low input voltages, particularly in highly integrated semiconductor devices, leading to issues with transient response, ripple, and power supply rejection ratio (PSRR).

Innovation Solution

A low dropout (LDO) regulator with a dual-loop control mechanism, incorporating coarse and fine power transistors, and a gate driving unit that generates gating signals using both input voltage and its negative, enabling stable operation at low input voltages by adjusting transistor gating based on output voltage differences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional voltage regulators are used to operate at low input voltages, then power consumption increases and efficiency decreases, but using traditional regulator designs maintains simpler circuit structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the voltage regulation function into two separate control loops: a coarse control loop for large voltage adjustments and a fine control loop for precise voltage regulation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve low power consumption across different operating ranges while managing circuit complexity through functional division

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic switching between coarse and fine control loops based on the voltage difference between input and output. When the voltage difference is large, the coarse loop is activated; when the difference is small, the fine loop takes over. This dynamic adaptation optimizes power consumption while maintaining regulation accuracy across varying load conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If conventional LDO regulators are used, then transient response and ripple performance deteriorate at low voltages, but implementing dual-loop control increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransient response and rippleVSAvoidcontrol mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control mechanism into coarse and fine loops, where the coarse loop handles large-signal transient responses and the fine loop manages small-signal ripple suppression. This segmentation improves transient response and ripple performance without requiring a complete redesign of the entire control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a control unit as an intermediary that manages the switching between coarse and fine loops. This intermediary component coordinates the two control mechanisms, allowing them to work together seamlessly to improve transient response and ripple performance while keeping the overall system architecture manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If single-loop control is used, then voltage regulation precision decreases, but implementing dual-loop control increases power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage regulation precisionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically selects which control loop to activate based on the voltage difference magnitude. The coarse loop is used when the voltage difference is large, consuming more power but providing faster response. The fine loop is used when the voltage difference is small, consuming less power and providing precise regulation. This dynamic selection optimizes the balance between precision and power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using only the necessary control loop for each operating condition. The coarse loop provides sufficient control for large voltage differences without needing the fine loop's precision, reducing power consumption. Conversely, the fine loop provides excessive precision for small voltage differences where full precision is not always required, optimizing the power-precision tradeoff

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12585297B2LDO regulator capable of being operated at low voltage and semiconductor device including the same
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12585297B2 patent drawing
  • US12585297B2 patent drawing
  • US12585297B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A low dropout (LDO) regulator includes: one or more power transistors configured to dispose between an input node and an output node, wherein the input node is a node to which an input voltage is applied and the output node is a node from which an output voltage is output; a voltage comparing unit configured to generate a comparative signal based on a difference between the output voltage and a first reference voltage; a digital control unit configured to generate a control signal for gating of the one or more power transistors in response to the comparative signal; and a gate driving unit configured to output a gating signal for the one or more power transistors in response to the control signal, wherein the gating signal is corresponding to one of the input voltage and a negative of the input voltage.