Dual Metadata Tree for Storage Object Location Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise storage systems face challenges in managing large numbers of clones or snapshots, leading to metadata bloat and inefficient data storage due to each copy managing its own metadata structure, which complicates lookups, data access, and modifications.

Innovation Solution

A dual-metadata tree system is implemented, where a primary metadata tree provides a virtual address for locating primary object data, and sub-trees from leaf nodes manage derived objects, with an ancestry graph linking derived object identifiers to facilitate quick lookups and reduce metadata overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If each copy manages its own metadata structure, then data access and modifications can be performed independently, but metadata bloat occurs and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent data access and modificationsVSAvoidmetadata structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple independent metadata structures managed by each copy are merged into a single shared metadata structure. This allows all copies to access and modify data independently while avoiding the complexity of managing separate metadata structures for each copy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shared metadata structure serves multiple copies simultaneously, making it a universal structure that handles data for all copies. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate metadata structures while preserving independent access capabilities through copy-specific lookup paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple clones or snapshots are created, then data protection and development capabilities are enhanced, but storage space is consumed by excess data copies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protection and development capabilitiesVSAvoidstorage space consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple copies share common data blocks through the shared metadata structure, merging their data storage requirements. This allows many clones and snapshots to coexist without consuming proportional storage space for each copy's data, as they all reference the same underlying data blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating physical copies of data for each clone or snapshot, the system creates references to the same data blocks. This logical copying approach enables unlimited copies to be created while using minimal additional storage space, as only the metadata references are duplicated, not the actual data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Quantity of substance

If data deduplication and change bitmaps are used, then data bloat from copies is reduced, but lookup and access operations become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata bloat reductionVSAvoidlookup and access operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex data deduplication and change bitmap mechanisms are extracted and replaced with a simpler shared metadata structure. This extraction eliminates the need for complex deduplication algorithms while maintaining efficient data access through direct lookup paths in the shared metadata tree.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The metadata structure is segmented into a shared common metadata structure and copy-specific lookup paths. This segmentation allows simple, direct access for each copy while the shared structure handles deduplication implicitly, reducing operational complexity compared to managing complex deduplication logic for each copy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11940969B2Managing locations of derived storage objects
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11940969B2 patent drawing
  • US11940969B2 patent drawing
  • US11940969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are techniques for managing data locations of derived storage objects. The techniques include accessing a primary metadata tree providing a lookup path using a virtual address to locate data for a primary object in physical storage pointed to by a leaf node of the primary metadata tree and providing a sub-tree from a leaf node of the primary metadata tree associated with the primary object, the sub-tree providing lookup paths using virtual addresses for derived objects. Wherein a derived object is a view of the primary object at a specific point in time, with copy leaf nodes of the sub-tree pointing to stored data of the derived objects. The techniques further include maintaining an ancestry graph associated with the sub-tree with the ancestry graph linking derived object identifiers to provide an ancestral chain lookup to identify derived object identifiers of the closest stored physical data of a derived object.