Dual Microphone Noise Reduction for Headsets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing voice communication headsets face challenges in reducing non-stationary noise without degrading voice quality, especially in noisy environments, as the microphone's proximity to the mouth decreases with shrinking headset sizes.

Innovation Solution

A dual-microphone system is implemented, where a second microphone is placed inside an ear chamber to capture a reduced noise signal, which is then corrected by the first microphone's signal using echo cancellation, spectral shaping, and dynamic equalization to produce a filtered signal for improved noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the microphone is moved farther from the wearer's mouth to reduce headset size, then the headset becomes more compact and portable, but the noise reduction capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheadset sizeVSAvoidenvironmental noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the noise reduction function into two independent microphones: the first microphone captures speech with some noise, while the second microphone placed in the ear canal captures primarily noise. This segmentation allows each microphone to specialize in capturing specific sound components, enabling effective noise reduction despite the reduced distance from the mouth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second microphone placed in the ear canal acts as an intermediary that captures environmental noise directly at the ear location. This intermediary measurement allows the system to subtract the captured noise profile from the speech signal, effectively reducing noise without requiring the main microphone to be positioned far from the mouth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If noise reduction algorithms are applied to reduce stationary noise by 12 dB, then noise reduction is improved, but speech quality may be degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestationary noise reductionVSAvoidspeech quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the noise component by capturing it separately with the second microphone in the ear canal. By isolating and removing only the noise portion through subtraction, the system achieves up to 24 dB noise reduction while preserving speech quality, avoiding the degradation that occurs with traditional algorithms that must compromise between noise reduction and speech fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from algorithmic noise reduction to physical separation of noise capture. By placing the second microphone in the ear canal and using spectral subtraction based on the captured noise profile, the system achieves superior noise reduction (up to 24 dB) without degrading speech quality, fundamentally changing the noise reduction parameter from algorithmic processing to physical measurement and subtraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a second microphone is placed inside the ear canal chamber, then noise reduction capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction capabilityVSAvoidmicrophone system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the functions of speech capture and noise measurement into a coordinated dual-microphone architecture. The first microphone captures speech while the second microphone in the ear canal captures noise, and their signals are combined through spectral subtraction. This merging of functions achieves superior noise reduction (up to 24 dB) while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the second microphone's noise measurement to continuously adjust the noise reduction processing. The captured noise profile from the ear canal is fed back into the signal processing chain to subtract the appropriate noise components from the speech signal, achieving adaptive noise reduction that responds to changing environmental conditions without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If echo cancellation and spectral shaping are applied to correct the second microphone signal, then speech quality is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech qualityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary echo cancellation and spectral shaping on the second microphone's noise measurement before using it for noise reduction. By pre-processing the noise signal to remove echo and shape its spectrum, the system ensures that the subsequent noise subtraction operates on cleaned, accurate noise data, improving speech quality while managing processing complexity through staged preprocessing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic equalization that adapts to the specific acoustic environment and user characteristics. The spectral shaping and equalization parameters are adjusted in real-time based on the captured signals and environmental conditions, allowing the system to optimize speech quality for each user and situation while maintaining efficient processing through adaptive rather than static processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces ambient noise while maintaining speech quality, enhancing the headset's noise reduction capabilities without compromising other functional properties.

Implementation Method 1

An earpiece is provided which forms a chamber with an ear when the earpiece is in contact with the ear. The chamber reduces ambient noise from outside the chamber.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentUS7773759B2Dual microphone noise reduction for headset application
Publication Date: 2010.08.10 QUALCOMM TECH INT
  • US7773759B2 patent drawing
  • US7773759B2 patent drawing
  • US7773759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved vocal signals are obtained in headsets and similar devices by including a microphone inside a chamber formed at least in part by the wearer's ear. This second microphone provides a reduced noise input signal. The reduced noise signal is corrected by input from another microphone, located outside the chamber. This correction can include echo cancellation, spectral shaping, frequency extension, and the like.