Dual-Mode ASIC Tile Operation for Power and Current Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural network computation systems face challenges in managing power consumption and current rate changes during high computational loads, which can exceed design constraints and make them vulnerable to attacks.

Innovation Solution

Integrated circuits, such as ASICs, are designed to operate in two modes: a first mode where all tiles process data concurrently and a second mode where a delay is introduced to stagger data processing, allowing for dynamic selection based on the number of operable tiles or columns, thereby controlling power consumption and current changes within design constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If all tiles process data concurrently in the first mode, then computational productivity is improved, but power consumption and current rate changes exceed design constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational throughputVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between two operational modes based on computational load. In the first mode, all tiles operate concurrently to maximize throughput when power constraints are not violated. In the second mode, tiles are staggered in time to reduce instantaneous power consumption when constraints are exceeded. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by adjusting the degree of parallelism according to real-time power conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The second mode implements periodic action by dividing tile operations into sequential time slots rather than simultaneous execution. Tiles are activated in staggered periods, with each tile receiving input data at different clock cycles. This periodic activation pattern reduces the instantaneous power consumption and current rate changes while still achieving the required computational throughput over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Speed

If all tiles process data concurrently, then computational speed is improved, but the system becomes vulnerable to attacks by exceeding current rate constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoidvulnerability to attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational mode based on the number of operable tiles and computational load. When the count of operable tiles exceeds a threshold, the system transitions to the second mode with staggered tile activation. This dynamic response prevents attack scenarios where simultaneous activation of all tiles could be exploited, while maintaining high speed operation during normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If delay registers are introduced to stagger tile operation, then power consumption is controlled within constraints, but computational productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumption controlVSAvoidcomputational throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between full parallelism (first mode) and staggered operation (second mode) based on whether power constraints are violated. This dynamic mode selection ensures that the delay-induced productivity loss only occurs when absolutely necessary for power control, maximizing overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The second mode maintains continuous useful action by ensuring that while tiles are staggered in time, the overall computational pipeline remains active. Input data is continuously supplied to tiles as they become available, and output data flows continuously from completed tiles. This continuous flow minimizes idle time and maintains high utilization of the computational resources despite the staggered activation pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3824554B1Dual-mode operation of application specific integrated circuits
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 GOOGLE LLC
  • EP3824554B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3824554B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3824554B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A method for operating an integrated circuit chip including multiple tiles (202a-202d) includes determining a configuration for the tiles for execution of a computation. When the configuration for the tiles satisfies a first criterion, the integrated circuit is operated in a first mode, including concurrently receiving respective input data (208a, 208b) at each of the tiles (202a-202d). When the configuration for the tiles satisfies a second criterion, the integrated circuit is operated in a second mode, including: at a first time, concurrently receiving respective first input data (208a, 208b) at each tile (202a, 202b) of a first group of tiles; at the first time, storing respective second input data (208a, 208b) in each of multiple delay registers (212a, 212b), each delay register corresponding to a tile (202c, 202d) of a second group of tiles; at a second time, releasing the second input data from the delay registers (212a, 212b) and receiving the released respective second input data at each tile (202c, 202d) of the second group of tiles.