Dual Mode IGBT Gate Drive Reduces Switching Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gate drivers for IGBTs in hybrid-electric powertrains face limitations in controlling switching delay time, current slope, and voltage slope, leading to increased switching losses and stress on semiconductor devices, especially under varying operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A two-step gate driving strategy using a voltage regulated source followed by a current regulated source, with feedback from operating conditions, to optimize switching performance by maintaining constant voltage and current levels, reducing switching losses and stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a conventional gate driver is used to control the IGBT gate, then the device is simple to operate, but the switching loss increases and switching speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossVSAvoidgate driver complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate driver is segmented into two distinct circuits: a voltage regulated source for initial gate charging and a current regulated source for maintaining optimal gate current. This segmentation allows each circuit to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall switching loss while managing complexity through functional division

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gate driver transitions from a static conventional design to a dynamic dual-mode system that automatically switches between voltage regulated and current regulated modes based on real-time gate voltage and current conditions, optimizing switching performance across varying operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If a conventional gate driver is used, then the device structure is simple, but the switching speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidgate driver structure
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The voltage regulated source performs preliminary action by rapidly charging the gate capacitance to the required voltage level before transitioning to the current regulated source, which then maintains optimal gate current to sustain high switching speed throughout the switching event

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operating parameters by switching between voltage regulated mode (for initial charging) and current regulated mode (for sustained optimal current), allowing the gate driver to adapt to different stages of the switching process and maintain high switching speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If a conventional gate driver is used, then the circuit is simple, but the voltage and current slope control precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage and current slope control precisionVSAvoidgate driver circuit
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate driver incorporates feedback mechanisms where the voltage regulated source monitors gate voltage and the current regulated source monitors gate current, automatically adjusting their output to maintain precise voltage and current slopes during the switching event, thereby achieving high control precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts between voltage regulation and current regulation modes based on real-time conditions, enabling precise control of voltage and current slopes during different phases of the switching event, which improves control precision while managing circuit complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a conventional gate driver is used, then the device is simple to manufacture, but the stress on semiconductor devices increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemiconductor device reliabilityVSAvoidgate driver device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the gate driver into voltage regulated and current regulated sources, each circuit can be optimized to control specific aspects of gate driving, preventing excessive voltage or current spikes that would increase stress on the IGBT and improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-mode gate driver dynamically changes regulation parameters based on operating conditions, maintaining optimal gate voltage and current levels that reduce electrical stress on the semiconductor devices, thereby improving reliability while managing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10071652B2Dual mode IGBT gate drive to reduce switching loss
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10071652B2 patent drawing
  • US10071652B2 patent drawing
  • US10071652B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle powertrain includes an electric machine, an inverter including an IGBT having a gate configured to flow current through a phase of the electric machine, and a gate driver. The gate driver is configured to supply power onto the gate via a voltage regulated source, and in response to a collector current of the IGBT exceeding a previous steady state current through the phase, transition to a current regulated source to drive the gate. The gate driver may be configured to delay the transition by a predetermined time that is based on a difference between the previous steady state current and a reverse recovery peak current.