Dual Mode Touchpad Proximity Detection Power Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Touchpad systems in battery-operated devices face high power consumption due to high polling rates, leading to reduced battery life, necessitating more efficient power management solutions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a touchpad system with proximity detection capabilities that switches from a high polling touch mode to a low power proximity mode after inactivity, using a proximity circuit to detect user presence and reduce polling rates, thereby conserving power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the touch circuit continuously monitors the touchpad at high polling rates to ensure accurate touch detection, then touch detection accuracy is improved, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between two operational modes: touch mode with high polling rate for accurate touch detection, and proximity mode with low polling rate for power saving. The controller adjusts the polling rate based on detected user presence, making the system adaptive to current usage conditions rather than operating at fixed high polling rates continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The polling rate parameter is changed based on operational context. In touch mode, the polling rate is set to a first (high) rate for accurate touch detection. When no touch is detected and proximity mode is activated, the polling rate is reduced to a second (low) rate to conserve power, while still maintaining sufficient resolution for detecting user proximity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If the polling rate is reduced to save power during inactivity, then power consumption decreases, but the ability to detect fast or fine movements is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidmovement detection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The polling rate is dynamically adjusted based on user presence detection. When a user is detected in proximity mode, the system switches to touch mode with high polling rate, ensuring that fast or fine movements can be detected accurately when needed. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by providing high-speed detection capability on-demand rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The proximity detection circuit performs preliminary detection of user presence before full touch detection is activated. This allows the system to prepare for potential fast movements by switching to high polling rate touch mode in advance, rather than reacting after movement has already occurred.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If a proximity detection circuit is added to enable low power mode, then power efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The proximity detection circuit utilizes the existing capacitive sensor array for dual purposes: both for traditional touch detection and for proximity detection. By monitoring capacitance changes on the sensor array, the system can detect both direct finger touches and nearby objects using the same hardware infrastructure, reducing the need for entirely separate proximity sensing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves as an intermediary that manages the interaction between the touch circuit and proximity detection functionality. It coordinates switching between touch mode and proximity mode, and manages the decoupling of circuits, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture by using existing components in combination rather than requiring fully independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces power consumption by lowering polling rates during inactivity periods, extending battery life while maintaining accurate touch detection upon user interaction.

Implementation Method 1

The touchpad is a capacitive device. The proximity circuit is configured to detect a change in an electrical property of the touchpad sensor array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

The touch circuit is configured to detect a change in an electrical property of the touchpad to detect a touch on the touchpad

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS8743083B2Dual mode touchpad with a low power mode using a proximity detection mode
Publication Date: 2014.06.03 LOGITECH EUROPE SA
  • US8743083B2 patent drawing
  • US8743083B2 patent drawing
  • US8743083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a touchpad sensor array, a touch circuit, and a proximity circuit. The touch circuit executes a touch mode configured to track the position of a user or conductive object on the touchpad sensor array by detecting a change in an electrical property of the touchpad. The proximity circuit executes a proximity detection mode configured to track the position of a user or conductive object near or proximate to the touchpad sensor array by detecting a change in an electrical property of the touchpad. The system is configured to switch from the touch mode to the proximity detection mode after a predetermined period of inactivity, where the proximity detection mode can operate at one or more reduced polling rates, resulting in a reduced overall power dissipation. The system is configured to switch back to the touch mode when activity is detected by the proximity circuit.