Dual-Module POS System for Concurrent Transaction Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current point of sale systems in retail environments often lead to inefficiencies and increased customer wait times due to the inability to process multiple transactions simultaneously, as employees can only manage one transaction at a time, limiting the capacity to serve multiple customers concurrently.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual-point of sale system with a full POS module and a scan-only POS module that allows for the simultaneous execution of transactions, enabling employees to start scanning items for a second transaction while a first customer is paying, thereby reducing employee downtime and customer wait times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single point of sale module is used to ensure system simplicity and ease of operation, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases because only one transaction can be processed at a time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing capacityVSAvoidPOS system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The POS system is divided into two distinct modules: a full POS module with complete transaction processing capabilities and a scan-only POS module for rapid item scanning. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple transactions simultaneously while maintaining operational simplicity within each module type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The full POS module serves multiple functions including item scanning, transaction processing, payment handling, and receipt generation. The scan-only module handles scanning while the system shares common resources (database, printer, cash drawer) to achieve multi-functionality without requiring completely separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If employees process one transaction at a time to maintain ease of operation, then operational simplicity is preserved, but loss of time increases due to employee downtime between transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer wait timeVSAvoidtransaction management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The scan-only POS module allows employees to begin scanning items for the next transaction in advance while the current transaction is being processed. This preliminary action eliminates idle time between transactions and reduces customer wait times without complicating the operational workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous scanning operations through the scan-only module while payment processing occurs in the full POS module. This continuity ensures that employees are always engaged in useful work (scanning or processing) rather than experiencing downtime between sequential transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If a dual-point of sale system is implemented to increase productivity and reduce wait times, then transaction processing speed improves, but device complexity increases due to multiple modules and switching requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrent transaction capacityVSAvoidmodule switching mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Both POS modules share common hardware resources including the database, receipt printer, and cash drawer. This merging of resources reduces the overall system complexity by eliminating the need for completely separate hardware for each module, while still enabling concurrent transaction processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a switching mechanism that acts as an intermediary between the scan-only and full POS modules, automatically routing transactions to the appropriate module based on current system state. This mediator simplifies module coordination and reduces the operational complexity of managing multiple POS instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the full POS module processes all transactions to ensure comprehensive functionality, then adaptability is maintained, but productivity decreases due to sequential processing limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction throughputVSAvoidtransaction handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Transaction processing is segmented into two pathways: rapid scanning through the scan-only module and comprehensive processing through the full POS module. This segmentation allows the system to handle different transaction types with appropriate levels of processing detail, increasing overall throughput while maintaining full functionality where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The scan-only module performs partial transaction processing (scanning and item entry) without completing the full payment and receipt sequence. This partial action allows rapid item capture that can be completed later by the full POS module, increasing transaction throughput while maintaining comprehensive processing capability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10956890B2System and method for point of sale transactions
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US10956890B2 patent drawing
  • US10956890B2 patent drawing
  • US10956890B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are methods and systems for executing a first transaction at a checkout system at substantially the same time that a second transaction is started at the checkout system. For example, a cashier can scan one or more items, adding the items to a first transaction. When all items have been added to the first transaction and a first customer is making a payment in the first transaction, the cashier can begin to add items to a second transaction, such that execution of the first transaction occurs at substantially the same time that items are added to the second transaction.