Dual-Motor EV Drive System Segmentation for Power and Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric vehicle powertrains, particularly hybrid and all-electric vehicles, face challenges in achieving improved power output and efficiency while maintaining performance, range, reliability, safety, and cost-effectiveness, with existing multi-motor configurations being complex and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A dual-motor drive assembly comprising a permanent magnet synchronous motor and an induction asynchronous motor, each mechanically coupled to a vehicle axle with dedicated controllers and a vehicle controller that optimally splits power between the two motors based on torque requests, motor characteristics, and real-time updates from sensors, utilizing a single battery pack and inverters for efficient energy distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single electric motor is used in an all-electric vehicle, then the drive train complexity is reduced, but the power output and efficiency are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive train complexityVSAvoidpower output
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The powertrain is segmented into two independent motor systems: a permanent magnet synchronous motor system and an induction motor system. Each motor can operate independently or in combination, allowing the system to achieve high power output when needed while maintaining simplicity by using only one motor at a time during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between single-motor and dual-motor operation modes based on power demands. The vehicle controller optimally splits power between the two motors in real-time, enabling the system to adapt its complexity level to match the required power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If multiple electric motors are used to improve power output and efficiency, then the power and efficiency are enhanced, but the drive train complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoiddrive train complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-motor system is segmented into two distinct motor types with different operational characteristics, allowing them to be controlled independently. This segmentation enables the system to use only the necessary motor(s) for current operating conditions, reducing effective complexity while maintaining high power capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle controller changes operational parameters by dynamically adjusting the power split between motors based on real-time conditions. This allows optimal efficiency and power output without requiring complex mechanical linkages or transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If hybrid drive train with internal combustion engine and electric motor is used, then the gas mileage is improved, but the harmful pollution emissions are still present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas mileageVSAvoidpollution emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The internal combustion engine is completely extracted from the powertrain, replaced by a dual-motor electric drive system. This elimination removes the source of harmful emissions while maintaining improved energy efficiency through optimal motor operation and regenerative braking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Use of energy by moving object

If hybrid drive train with internal combustion engine and electric motor is used, then the gas mileage is improved, but the drive train complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas mileageVSAvoiddrive train complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The internal combustion engine and its associated complex mechanical systems are extracted and replaced with an all-electric dual-motor powertrain. This simplification eliminates the need for complex engine-motor integration while maintaining energy efficiency benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical complexity of the hybrid system is replaced with electrical control systems. The vehicle controller manages power distribution between motors electronically, eliminating the need for complex mechanical couplings, transmissions, and engine control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual-motor configuration optimizes power output and efficiency, providing improved operational performance, extended driving range, and reduced complexity and weight, with the permanent magnet motor excelling in low-speed applications and the induction motor in high-speed, high-torque scenarios, resulting in a flatter power curve and enhanced overall efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

at least one permanent magnet synchronous motor mechanically coupled to, and configured to provide propulsive power to, at least one wheel of a first vehicle axle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

at least one induction asynchronous motor mechanically coupled to, and configured to provide propulsive power to, at least one wheel of a second vehicle axle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9789871B1High efficiency, high power density drive system utilizing complementary motor assemblies
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 ATIEVA INC(US)
  • US9789871B1 patent drawing
  • US9789871B1 patent drawing
  • US9789871B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dual-motor electric vehicle (EV) drive system is provided that employs two different types of electric motors; at least one permanent magnet synchronous motor and at least one induction asynchronous motor. Under most low demand driving applications the EV relies on the permanent magnet motor(s), thus benefiting from the operating efficiency of this type of motor. Under high demand driving applications, for example during strong acceleration and high speed cruising, the EV is able to benefit from the output power capabilities of the induction motor(s).