Dual-Orifice Spray Actuator for Selective Mass Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dispensers with aerosol valve assemblies cannot selectively generate different sprays with varying mass flow rates, limiting user flexibility for diverse applications.

Innovation Solution

A dispenser system featuring an actuator with a stem having first and second orifices, a gasket, and a biased member, allowing for different actuator presses to uncover either the first orifice for a lower mass flow rate or both orifices for a higher mass flow rate, with distinct areas and rib configurations to control the stem's movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional aerosol valve assembly is used, then the dispenser can release product with a single mass flow rate, but the user cannot selectively generate different sprays as desired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to generate different spraysVSAvoidcomplexity of valve assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve assembly is segmented into multiple orifices (first orifice and second orifice) with different flow characteristics. The stem divides the single flow path into separate channels, allowing selective activation of different spray modes through partial or full depression of the actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stem is designed to move dynamically between different positions (first position, second position, third position) based on actuator depression depth. The biased member provides dynamic restoring force, enabling the system to transition between closed state, first spray mode, and second spray mode through varying levels of actuator compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the actuator is designed with multiple areas for different spray rates, then the user can selectively control mass flow rate, but the actuator structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control over spray outputVSAvoidactuator structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is divided into distinct areas (first area and second area) with different functional properties. The first area corresponds to a shallower depression that activates only the second orifice for low-flow mode, while the second area corresponds to deeper depression that activates both orifices for high-flow mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The stem acts as an intermediary element that translates actuator depression depth into selective orifice activation. The gasket serves as another intermediary that seals against specific orifices based on stem position, mediating between user input and spray output control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If the stem moves different distances to uncover different orifices, then different mass flow rates are achieved, but the precision of flow rate control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass flow rate controlVSAvoidorifice positioning and stem travel
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The biased member provides automatic restoring force that returns the stem to its neutral position, ensuring consistent sealing against the gasket. The mechanical design of the actuator and stem creates natural stop positions that limit excessive travel, reducing the need for high-precision manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system controls mass flow rate by changing the activation state of different orifices rather than precisely controlling stem position. The first orifice and second orifice have inherently different flow characteristics, so activating one versus both creates distinct spray modes without requiring exact positional control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the user to switch between a lower and higher mass flow rate by pressing different areas of the actuator, providing greater control over the spray output without requiring settings, with the spray-more position delivering a noticeably larger amount of fluid than the spray-less position.

Implementation Method 1

a biased member that biases the stem to the non-actuated position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiasing force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP3296230B1System and method for a dispenser to generate different sprays
Publication Date: 2021.07.21 PRECISION VALVE CORP
  • EP3296230B1 patent drawingFigure 1(a)~1(b)
  • EP3296230B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3296230B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~3(c)

AI summary

A system releases spray fluid in different mass flow rates. The system includes an actuator (105) having a first area (155) and a second area (160), a stem (230) connected to the actuator (105) and having a first orifice (610) and a second orifice (615), a gasket (265) covering the first orifice (610) and the second orifice (615) in a non-actuated position, and a biased member (270) biasing the stem (230) to the non-actuated position. When the first area (155) of the actuator (105) is pressed, the stem (230) moves a first distance relative to the gasket (265) to uncover the second orifice (615) and compressing the biased member (270) to spray fluid with a first mass flow rate. When the second area of the actuator (105) is pressed, the stem (230) moves a second distance relative to the gasket (265) to uncover the first orifice (610) and the second orifice (615) to spray fluid with a second mass flow rate greater than the first mass flow rate.