Dual Over-Center Locking Mechanism for Image Forming Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image forming devices have complex designs that make it difficult for users to access and replace consumable units, leading to ergonomic challenges, potential toner spills, and print defects due to inaccurate module placement and mounting.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a dual locking mechanism system using over-center mechanisms and a four-bar locking mechanism to securely mount image forming device modules to door assemblies, allowing for easy access and minimizing user input force while ensuring accurate and secure positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If modules are mounted to move with door panels to improve accessibility, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision and positioning accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule accessibilityVSAvoidmodule positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The door assembly is segmented into multiple door panels, each capable of independent movement between open and closed positions. Modules can be selectively mounted on specific door panels or the device body, allowing flexible positioning and access while maintaining precise mounting locations through dedicated mounting structures on each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting system transitions from static to dynamic by allowing modules to move with door panels when mounted on them, while providing secure fixed positioning when mounted on the device body. The locking mechanisms enable the system to switch between mobile and fixed states based on operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If secure mounting configurations with large hold-in forces are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule positioning accuracyVSAvoiduser input force
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Spring-loaded locking mechanisms are pre-loaded with biasing forces that automatically engage when door panels are closed, securing modules without requiring users to apply large forces. The preliminary loading of springs in the locking mechanisms ensures that securing action occurs automatically as part of the normal door closing operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanisms act as intermediaries between the user's closing action and the module securing function. These mechanisms translate the relatively small force of door closure into large hold-in forces on the modules through mechanical advantage and spring loading, eliminating the need for users to directly apply large securing forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex device designs are used to achieve functionality, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule placement flexibilityVSAvoidmounting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanisms are designed as universal components that can secure multiple different module types on different door panels. The same basic locking mechanism structure serves multiple functions: securing modules during door closure, maintaining positioning during operation, and releasing during door opening. This multi-functionality reduces the need for specialized mounting structures for each module type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting and securing functions are merged into integrated mounting structures that combine attachment features with locking mechanisms. Rather than separate mounting brackets and locking devices, the design integrates these functions into unified structures that reduce the total number of components while providing secure module retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides secure and accurate mounting of modules with minimal user effort, improving ergonomics and reducing the risk of toner spills and print defects by ensuring modules are correctly positioned within the device.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the separate over-center mechanisms may have its own biasing member to secure the module to the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The second locking mechanism may be engaged through movement of a lever arm to rotate an over-center crank that moves a reciprocating link into and out of engagement with the biasing member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 3

A shared clamping member may be engaged using a four-bar locking mechanism to secure the module to the body with a first securing force when the first door assembly is closed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFour-Bar Linkage: Four-Bar Linkage

Data Source

PatentUS7349648B2Securing mechanism for an image forming device module
Publication Date: 2008.03.25 LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7349648B2 patent drawing
  • US7349648B2 patent drawing
  • US7349648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming device with one or more door assemblies that engage locking mechanisms to secure a module in an operating position. The module may be coupled to one of the one or more door assemblies. A first locking mechanism may secure the module to the image forming device body when a first door assembly is closed. A second locking mechanism may secure the module to the body with a greater securing force than the first locking mechanism to secure the module to the body. The second locking mechanism may be engaged upon closing a second door assembly. Separate biasing members may be used to apply the securing forces. The locking mechanisms may include four-bar or over-center mechanisms to apply the securing forces.