Dual-Path PLL Circuit for Low Jitter and High PSRR

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Phase-locked loops (PLLs) face challenges in achieving low jitter, low power consumption, small area occupancy, wide operating range, and immunity to process, voltage, and temperature variations while maintaining a high power supply rejection ratio.

Innovation Solution

The proposed phase-locked loop circuit incorporates an oscillator, a detection block, an integral path, and a proportional path, where the detection block generates both integral and proportional signals to regulate the oscillator's power supply and control terminal, respectively, allowing for frequency control and improved power supply rejection ratio through a feedback loop with an error amplifier.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional PLL uses a single control path for frequency regulation, then the circuit complexity is low, but the power supply rejection ratio and jitter performance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply rejection ratioVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control path is segmented into two independent paths: integral path for long-term frequency accuracy and proportional path for short-term jitter suppression. Each path processes control signals differently, allowing optimized performance for each function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A dual-path control structure acts as an intermediary between the phase detector and VCO, where the integral path provides DC offset correction and the proportional path provides dynamic jitter suppression, together achieving superior power supply rejection ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the PLL increases power consumption to reduce jitter, then jitter performance improves, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejitter performanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts control parameters through two paths: the integral path adjusts DC control voltage for frequency accuracy, while the proportional path adjusts AC control signals for jitter suppression, optimizing performance without excessive power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The proportional path applies partial correction only when phase error occurs, rather than continuous full-power operation, reducing average power consumption while maintaining jitter performance during transient conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the PLL uses analog control signals for frequency regulation, then the operating range is continuous, but immunity to process, voltage, and temperature variations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating rangeVSAvoidimmunity to PVT variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The integral path implements feedback control that continuously monitors and corrects for PVT variations, adjusting the DC control voltage to maintain accurate frequency operation across varying process, voltage, and temperature conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters dynamically: the integral path modifies DC voltage to compensate for PVT drift, while the proportional path adjusts AC control amplitude and frequency to maintain stability across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Area of stationary object

If the PLL reduces area occupancy by integrating components, then area efficiency improves, but the ability to maintain phase lock under varying conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearea occupancyVSAvoidphase lock stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The integral and proportional control paths are merged into a unified dual-path architecture that shares common components such as the phase detector and VCO, reducing overall area occupancy while maintaining the functional independence needed for stable phase locking under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8878614B2Phase-locked loop
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 MEGACHIPS
  • US8878614B2 patent drawing
  • US8878614B2 patent drawing
  • US8878614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A PLL circuit includes an oscillator, a detection block, an integral path and a proportional path. The oscillator generates an oscillation signal. The detection block detects a phase difference between the oscillation signal and a reference signal and generates an integral signal that represents an integral value of the phase difference and a proportional signal that represents a current value of the phase difference. The integral path includes a regulator that receives the integral signal and supplies a regulated integral signal to the oscillator, and the regulator has a feedback loop including an error amplifier. The proportional path supplies the proportional signal, separately from the integral signal, to the oscillator. The oscillator generates the oscillation signal having an oscillation frequency controlled by both of the regulated integral signal and the proportional signal such that the phase of the oscillation signal is locked to the phase of the reference signal.