Dual-Path Transaction Validation for Nomadic Fraud Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic transaction systems lack effective validation methods to ensure the authenticity of account information, leading to significant fraud and financial losses, particularly in nomadic transactions where geographic location verification is challenging.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a communication device with two communication paths to enhance transaction security by sending validation information over one path and receiving responses over another, allowing for validation based on previously transmitted data sets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If geographic location verification is used to validate transactions, then fraud prevention is improved, but nomadic transactions (authorized transactions from multiple locations) are incorrectly blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidnomadic transaction support
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into multiple independent checks: device identification, communication path verification, and transaction authorization. Instead of relying solely on geographic location, the system divides validation into discrete components that can be independently verified, allowing nomadic transactions to pass through if other security checks succeed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A communication device (such as a mobile phone or tablet) serves as an intermediary between the transaction guarantor and the payment terminal. This intermediary carries validation information and establishes communication paths that verify the legitimacy of transactions regardless of geographic location, enabling authorized nomadic transactions while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If account information is transmitted over communication networks, then transaction convenience is improved, but security is worsened due to potential interception and fraud

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction convenienceVSAvoidtransaction security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Validation information is transmitted to the communication device in advance of the actual transaction. This preliminary transmission allows the device to be pre-authenticated, and subsequent transactions can be validated by verifying the communication path rather than re-transmitting sensitive account information, thus maintaining convenience while enhancing security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of transmitting sensitive account information over the network, the system uses a copy or representation of the account holder's device (the communication device) as the validation medium. The device itself carries cryptographic credentials that prove authenticity without exposing actual account details, preventing interception and fraud while maintaining transaction convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If two communication paths are used for validation, then transaction authenticity is improved, but system complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction authenticityVSAvoidcommunication path management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication device performs multiple functions: it serves as both the account holder's authentication credential and the validation information carrier. The same device that the account holder uses for communication also validates transactions by establishing communication paths, eliminating the need for separate validation hardware and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the account holder's communication device with the validation mechanism. Instead of separate components for authentication and validation, the device itself embodies both functions, and the communication paths are established through the same device interface, simplifying the user experience while maintaining dual-path verification security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9930020B2Validation method and system for use in securing nomadic electronic transactions
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 BCE
  • US9930020B2 patent drawing
  • US9930020B2 patent drawing
  • US9930020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method involving a communication device, which comprises sending a request to a communication device; receiving a response from the communication device over a local communication path; deriving a received data set from said response; determining at least one data set that had been previously transmitted to the communication device over a wireless portion of a second communication path different from the local communication path; and validating the response based on the received data set and the at least one previously transmitted data set.