Dual-Path Valve Assembly for Self-Regulating Fluid Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing proportional valves for regulating fluid flow in cooling systems are expensive and require complex control units for precise operation, which increases costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A valve arrangement comprising a throttle valve and a check valve with a pressure-dependent flow cross-section, allowing for self-regulation without external control, featuring a progressive characteristic curve at lower flows and degressive curve at higher flows, ensuring the flow rate is determined by the pressure differential.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If proportional valves with control units are used to regulate fluid flow, then precise flow control is achieved, but manufacturing costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidvalve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve arrangement uses the pressure differential between inlet and outlet to automatically regulate flow through the check valve's pressure-dependent cross-section, eliminating the need for external control units or actuators. The system self-regulates based on operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The flow path is divided into two parallel paths: a first path with a throttle valve for baseline flow control, and a second path with a check valve for pressure-dependent flow augmentation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve complex flow characteristics through simple passive components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If proportional valves with control units are used to regulate fluid flow, then precise flow control is achieved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive proportional valves and control units with inexpensive passive components (throttle valve and check valve) that have no moving parts requiring actuation. The simple mechanical design significantly reduces manufacturing costs while maintaining functional effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

By eliminating control units, actuators, and associated electronics, the system removes major cost drivers. The self-regulating mechanism using pressure differential and check valve geometry provides precise flow control without requiring any external power or control infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If a check valve with pressure-dependent cross-section is used in the second flow path, then automatic flow regulation is achieved, but valve structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow regulation automationVSAvoidvalve structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The check valve's flow cross-section is designed to change with pressure differential. As the pressure difference between inlet and outlet increases, the effective cross-section of the check valve decreases, providing automatic flow regulation through passive geometric design rather than active control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The valve arrangement achieves cost-effective and automatic regulation of fluid flow, reducing manufacturing costs and eliminating the need for external control units while maintaining precise flow control.

Implementation Method 1

The flow cross-section of the check valve decreases with increasing pressure difference between the inlet pressure and the outlet pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential effect: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

A throttle valve is arranged in the first flow path... typically exhibit a linear or degressive characteristic curve, where the volume flow rate increases proportionally or degressively with increasing pressure difference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrottling effect: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentEP4492185B1Valve assembly
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • EP4492185B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4492185B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4492185B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The application relates to a valve arrangement (1), comprising at least an inlet (2) and an outlet (3), a first flow path (4) connecting the inlet (2) with the outlet (3) in a fluid-technical manner, and a second flow path (5) connecting the inlet (2) with the outlet (3) in a fluid-technical manner, wherein a throttle valve (6) is arranged in the first flow path (4) and a check valve (7) is arranged in the second flow path (5), wherein a flow cross-section (8) of the check valve (7) decreases with increasing pressure difference (9) between a first pressure (10) in the inlet (2) and a second pressure (11) in the outlet (3).