Dual-Pawl Locking Mechanism for Fail-Safe Secure Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking mechanisms are assumed to provide secure connections without ensuring fail-safe locking, leading to potential insecurity if only one locking element is engaged.

Innovation Solution

A locking mechanism with independently rotatable first and second locking pawls, interacting with corresponding locking elements, ensuring secure locking only when both pawls are engaged, utilizing a fail-safe principle with spring forces and a Bowden cable for controlled rotation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single locking element is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of secure locking deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism structureVSAvoidsecure locking
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into multiple independent locking pawls (first locking pawl, second locking pawl) that can be rotated independently about a common rotary axis. Each pawl interacts with its own locking element, creating segmented locking functions that collectively provide secure locking while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multiple locking pawls are used, then the reliability of secure locking is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure lockingVSAvoidlocking mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple locking pawls are merged into a single locking mechanism body, sharing a common rotary axis and housing. This consolidation allows multiple locking functions to be achieved without proportionally increasing overall structural complexity, as the pawls operate within a unified mechanism framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If independent rotation of locking pawls is enabled, then the reliability of locking is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure lockingVSAvoidlocking operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pawls are designed to rotate independently through self-service mechanisms. When the locking mechanism engages with locking elements, the interaction forces automatically cause the pawls to rotate into their locked positions without requiring external actuation of each individual pawl, thereby maintaining ease of operation while ensuring reliable independent locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures secure locking in multiple directions by requiring simultaneous engagement of both pawls, providing visual and tactile feedback on locking status, and compensating for manufacturing tolerances through comfort pawls.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a fail-safe principle with spring forces and a Bowden cable for controlled rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

utilizing a fail-safe principle with spring forces and a Bowden cable for controlled rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force transmission: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS12534944B2Locking mechanism
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 GRAMMER AG
  • US12534944B2 patent drawing
  • US12534944B2 patent drawing
  • US12534944B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns a locking mechanism provided and adapted to interact with at least one locking element to establish a locking between the locking mechanism and the locking element, wherein the locking mechanism comprises a first locking pawl and a second locking pawl which are rotatable independently of each other about a first rotary axis, wherein the first locking pawl is provided and adapted to interact with a first locking element and wherein the second locking pawl is provided and adapted to interact with a second locking element, wherein a secured locking is present when the first locking element is locked to the first locking pawl and the second locking element is locked to the second locking pawl.