Dual-Phase Steel Sheet Formability via Alloy and Coiling Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for high-strength flat steel products with improved forming properties, particularly in vehicle construction, to meet requirements for lightweight construction, crash safety, and complex component structures, where existing dual-phase steels may not provide sufficient elasticity and strength.

Innovation Solution

A method for producing a flat steel product with specific alloying elements (C, Si, Mn, Al, and Cr) and a coiling temperature of 540 to 620 °C, followed by optional cold rolling and annealing, to achieve enhanced mechanical properties such as increased elasticity and strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional dual-phase steels with 70 to 90 vol% ferrite and martensite are used, then high tensile strength and good formability are achieved, but the yield strength ratio is not sufficiently low and elongation capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the composition ranges of alloying elements (C: 0.05-0.20 wt.%, Si: 0.01-0.50 wt.%, Mn: 1.00-3.00 wt.%, Al: 0.05-2.50 wt.%, Cr: 0.01-1.00 wt.%) and processing parameters (coiling temperature: 540-620°C, annealing temperature: 780-880°C, annealing time: 15-300 seconds) to optimize the microstructure. This results in a dual-phase steel with 70-90 vol% ferrite and 10-30 vol% martensite, achieving tensile strength of 580-710 MPa and elongation of at least 23%, while maintaining low yield strength ratio and excellent formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If higher carbon content is added to increase strength, then tensile strength improves, but total elongation and formability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidtotal elongation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the carbon content parameter within a specific range (0.05-0.20 wt.%) to balance strength and elongation. By controlling carbon at this moderate level and compensating with other alloying elements (particularly Mn: 1.00-3.00 wt.% and Cr: 0.01-1.00 wt.%), the steel achieves tensile strength of 580-710 MPa while maintaining total elongation of at least 23%, resolving the trade-off between strength and elongation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure consisting of two distinct phases: soft ferrite (70-90 vol%) providing ductility and toughness, and hard martensite (10-30 vol%) providing strength. This dual-phase composite structure enables the steel to simultaneously achieve high tensile strength (580-710 MPa) and high total elongation (at least 23%), as the soft ferrite matrix allows plastic deformation while the dispersed martensite islands provide strength reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If complex alloying is used to improve mechanical properties, then strength and formability are enhanced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by establishing specific composition ranges for five alloying elements (C, Si, Mn, Al, Cr) and controlling key processing parameters (coiling temperature: 540-620°C, annealing temperature: 780-880°C, annealing time: 15-300 seconds). This systematic parameter optimization achieves the desired mechanical properties (tensile strength: 580-710 MPa, elongation: ≥23%) through a well-defined manufacturing process, balancing performance enhancement with process controllability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in a flat steel product with improved tensile strength (580 MPa to 710 MPa) and elongation at break (at least 23%), suitable for safety-relevant components in vehicle construction, such as longitudinal and cross members, while maintaining surface quality and formability.

Implementation Method 1

The microstructure of typical DP steels consists of 70 to 90 vol% ferrite, with the remainder being martensite. In addition to martensite, small amounts of other carbon-rich transformation microstructures such as bainite and/or thermodynamically metastable retained austenite may be present.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

subsequent annealing in a continuous furnace with an optional subsequent coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Data Source

PatentEP3415646B1High-strength steel sheet having enhanced formability
Publication Date: 2020.08.05 THYSSENKRUPP AG
  • EP3415646B1 patent drawing
  • EP3415646B1 patent drawing
  • EP3415646B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for producing a steel flat product, a corresponding steel flat product, components made from such a steel flat product, and the use of the steel flat product.