Axially Opposed Dual-Piston Compressor for Reduced Vibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing compressors in household appliances like refrigerators generate significant vibrations and noise due to axial movement of pistons and electric motors, necessitating suspension springs to mitigate these issues.

Innovation Solution

A compressor design featuring two cylinder-piston arrangements aligned axially and operating in opposite directions, eliminating the need for suspension springs by balancing the system, and incorporating features like radial outlets, mufflers, and spring-biased valves to reduce vibrations and noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If a single cylinder-piston arrangement with axial movement is used, then gas compression function is achieved, but vibrations and noise are generated requiring suspension springs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibrations and noiseVSAvoidsuspension spring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two cylinder-piston arrangements into a single integrated system where the pistons are connected through a common connecting rod. This merging of two compression units into one balanced system allows the opposing pistons to counterbalance each other's vibrations, eliminating the need for separate suspension springs for each unit while maintaining effective gas compression functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs counterbalancing by positioning two pistons in opposite directions within the same cylinder, both connected to a common connecting rod. When one piston moves in one direction, the other piston moves in the opposite direction, creating counterbalancing forces that neutralize vibrations and reduce noise without requiring additional suspension mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If suspension springs are added to reduce vibrations, then vibration transfer is reduced, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration transferVSAvoidsuspension spring support system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the suspension spring system entirely by designing a self-balancing dual-piston mechanism. The opposing pistons inherently counterbalance each other's vibrations through their synchronized opposite movements, making external vibration reduction components unnecessary and simplifying the overall device structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-piston system serves itself by automatically counterbalancing vibrations through the inherent opposite movements of the two pistons. The system generates its own vibration reduction capability through the mechanical interaction of the opposing pistons and common connecting rod, without requiring external suspension springs or additional vibration control components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Volume of moving object

If axial space is reduced by removing suspension springs, then housing space is optimized, but vibration reduction capability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing internal spaceVSAvoidvibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two compression functions into a single balanced system that occupies less axial space than two separate units with individual suspension springs would require. The common connecting rod and shared cylinder structure consolidate the mechanism, freeing up housing space while the counterbalancing action inherently manages vibrations without needing external spring support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves reduced vibrations and noise by balancing the compressor, optimizing internal space, and enhancing piston response, while allowing for efficient gas compression and discharge.

Implementation Method 1

The piston is driven in axial direction between two end positions by a linear electric motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLinear electric motor: Linear Motor

Implementation Method 2

In order to reduce a vibration transfer in the housing, the cylinder-position arrangement and the electric motor are supported by suspension springs inside the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration reduction through suspension: Damping

Implementation Method 3

when the pistons are moved towards each other, the cylinder chamber is minimised in order to compress the gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas compression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP4600490A1Compressor, compression method and household appliance
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 BOSCH SIEMENS HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP4600490A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4600490A1 patent drawing
  • EP4600490A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a compressor for a kitchen appliance such as a refrigerator, wherein two cylinder-piston arrangements are positioned in axial alignment and operated opposite to each other, wherein a common cylinder chamber is axially limited by opposite pistons of the cylinder-piston arrangements, a method to operate the compressor and a kitchen appliance.