Dual-Polarity Differential Microphone for Common-Mode Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Differential microphone systems face challenges in accurately representing acoustic pressures due to interference from non-acoustic sources, such as light, which affects both positively-biased and negatively-biased output signals similarly, degrading the quality of the sound reproduced.

Innovation Solution

A dual-polarity biasing mechanism is applied to the diaphragms, where opposite biasing voltages ensure that both diaphragms experience the same magnitude and polarity offset from non-acoustic interference, allowing the differential signal to effectively cancel common-mode interference and accurately represent acoustic pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single-polarity biasing system is used in differential microphones, then the device complexity is reduced, but non-acoustic interference (such as light) affects the output signal, degrading measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of acoustic pressure representationVSAvoidbiasing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing system is segmented into two independent biasing circuits: a first biasing circuit applying positive voltage to the first diaphragm, and a second biasing circuit applying negative voltage to the second diaphragm. This segmentation allows each diaphragm to be biased independently with opposite polarities, enabling common-mode rejection of non-acoustic interference while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If dual-polarity biasing is applied to both diaphragms, then common-mode interference is cancelled improving signal accuracy, but the device complexity increases due to additional biasing circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferential signal accuracyVSAvoidbiasing circuit configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing system employs asymmetric polarity configuration where the first diaphragm is biased with positive voltage and the second diaphragm is biased with negative voltage. This asymmetric dual-polarity approach creates opposite electrical responses to non-acoustic interference, enabling the differential output to cancel common-mode noise while maintaining signal accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Reliability

If opposite biasing voltages are applied to the diaphragms, then the same diaphragm deflections produce output signals with opposite polarity enabling noise cancellation, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise cancellation capabilityVSAvoiddiaphragm matching tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The differential output configuration provides inherent feedback mechanisms where the opposite polarity responses of the two diaphragms to non-acoustic interference are combined to cancel common-mode noise. This feedback approach automatically compensates for minor manufacturing variations, reducing the stringency of manufacturing precision requirements while maintaining reliable noise cancellation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual-polarity biasing system enhances the accuracy of the differential signal by canceling common-mode interference, resulting in improved sound quality by isolating acoustic pressures from non-acoustic noise sources.

Implementation Method 1

the opposite biasing voltages applied to the first and second diaphragms causes the same diaphragm deflections to produce output signals that have the same magnitude but opposite polarity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric Effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

when the positively-biased signal and the negatively-biased signal are combined to produce the differential signal, common-mode interference is cancelled and the differential signal more accurately represents the acoustic pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentEP2974365B1Differential microphone with dual polarity bias
Publication Date: 2018.08.01 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2974365B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2974365B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2974365B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4C

AI summary

Methods and systems are described for cancelling interference in a microphone system. A positive bias voltage is applied to a first microphone diaphragm and a negative bias voltage is applied to a second microphone diaphragm. The diaphragms are configured to exhibit substantially the same mechanical deflection in response to acoustic pressures received by the microphone system. A differential output signal is produced by combining a positively-biased output signal from the first microphone diaphragm and a negatively-biased output signal from the second microphone diaphragm. This combining cancels common-mode interferences that are exhibited in both the positively-biased output signal and the negatively-biased output signal.