Dual Polarization Optical Modulator RF Loss Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electro-optical phase modulators experience mismatched S21 frequency responses at high frequencies, degrading the quality of the constellation diagram and digital sequences, particularly due to pattern-dependent scaling and frequency mismatching between I and Q signals.

Innovation Solution

The use of multiple interaction regions with different lengths for at least one electrode, cascaded to compensate for RF loss, ensuring well-matched S21 frequency responses by adjusting the geometric sequence of modulation strengths across electrodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single interaction region electrodes are used, then device structure is simple, but frequency response mismatch occurs at high frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode structureVSAvoidfrequency response matching
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode interaction regions are divided into multiple segments with different lengths along the waveguide. Each segment contributes differently to the overall modulation, allowing the frequency responses of I and Q inputs to be matched across a broad frequency range by compensating for RF loss variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the electrode structure are assigned different lengths and positions to create local variations in interaction strength. This allows specific regions to compensate for frequency-dependent RF loss, achieving uniform frequency response matching without requiring complex global restructuring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If electrode lengths are scaled to achieve modulation strength ratio, then modulation accuracy improves, but frequency response mismatch increases due to RF loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation strength accuracyVSAvoidfrequency response matching
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single scaled electrode length, the electrode is segmented into multiple interaction regions with carefully designed lengths. This segmentation allows the system to achieve both the required modulation strength ratio and frequency response matching by distributing the modulation function across multiple regions with compensating characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lengths of different electrode interaction regions are optimized as independent parameters to simultaneously satisfy both modulation strength requirements and frequency response matching. This parameter optimization approach allows the system to compensate for frequency-dependent RF loss while maintaining accurate modulation ratios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If RF loss is neglected in design, then electrode design is simpler, but actual frequency response shows significant mismatch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode designVSAvoidfrequency response matching
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode interaction region lengths are pre-designed to account for and compensate for frequency-dependent RF loss effects. By incorporating loss compensation into the initial design rather than adding it as a separate correction, the system achieves broadband frequency response matching without requiring complex additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves approximately equal S21 electro-optical frequency responses across a broad frequency range, from 10 kHz to 50 GHz, reducing frequency response mismatch and improving the quality of the constellation diagram even with velocity mismatch.

Implementation Method 1

electro-optical phase modulators having multiple multi-sectioned electrodes for modulating a single waveguide without domain inversion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectro-optic effect: Electro-Optic Effects

Data Source

PatentUS8873896B1Dual polarization optical modulator using dual broadband multi-electrode weighted direct analog phase modulators
Publication Date: 2014.10.28 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US8873896B1 patent drawing
  • US8873896B1 patent drawing
  • US8873896B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electro-optical phase modulator, dual polarization modulator applying that modulator and a phase modulation method are disclosed. A waveguide in an electro-optical substrate has at least two electrodes for modulating the waveguide. Each electrode receives a sequential bit of a precoded digital input and forms a shifting line from a first input end through interaction lengths near the waveguide causing modulation, shifted lengths distal from the waveguide for avoiding modulating the waveguide and transitions between these lengths by shifting the electrode away from or towards the waveguide. At least one electrode has a shorter interaction length closer to the input than a longer interaction length of the same electrode. Each electrode's modulation strength is proportional to its total interaction length, which doubles for each electrode, producing well matched S21 electro-optical responses from 10 kHz to 50 GHz, when shifted to account for the doubling.