Dual Power Amplifier Intra-band Non-contiguous CA MPR Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of standardization for Power Class 2 UE supporting NR intra-band non-contiguous CA, particularly in terms of maximum output power reduction and emission requirements, which affects the efficient transmission of uplink signals.

Innovation Solution

A device configured with dual power amplifiers and intra-band non-contiguous CA, using a first and second component carrier, determines maximum transmission power based on Maximum Power Reduction (MPR) to transmit uplink signals effectively, adhering to specific emission requirements and spectral emission masks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If intra-band non-contiguous carrier aggregation is implemented, then system capacity and spectral efficiency are improved, but maximum output power reduction requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidmaximum output power
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the power amplification function into two separate power amplifiers, each handling a different component carrier. This segmentation allows independent optimization of power output for each carrier, enabling the system to achieve higher total capacity while managing power reduction requirements through dual-PA architecture with separate gain control for each carrier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If dual power amplifier configuration is used, then uplink transmission efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink transmission efficiencyVSAvoidpower amplifier configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a unified power control mechanism that manages two power amplifiers through a single control interface. The processor applies maximum power reduction calculations to both PAs simultaneously, allowing the system to achieve multi-carrier transmission efficiency while maintaining relatively simple control architecture through universal power management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If maximum power reduction is applied, then emission compliance is improved, but transmission power decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission complianceVSAvoidtransmission power
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the power reduction parameter (MPR) based on the specific intra-band non-contiguous carrier aggregation configuration. By calculating MPR according to the frequency separation and bandwidth of aggregated carriers, the system achieves emission compliance while minimizing power reduction, thereby maintaining higher transmission power compared to fixed MPR approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12160835B2Maximum power reduction
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US12160835B2 patent drawing
  • US12160835B2 patent drawing
  • US12160835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A disclosure of this specification provides a device configured to operate in a wireless system and to support PC2 (Power Class 2), the device comprising: a transceiver configured with intra-band non-contiguous CA, wherein the transceiver is equipped with dual power amplifier, wherein the intra-band non-contiguous CA is configured to use a first CC(component carrier) and a second CC; and a processor operably connectable to the transceiver, wherein the processer is configured to: determine maximum transmission power, based on an MPR(Maximum Power Reduction), transmit uplink signal using the intra-band non-contiguous CA, based on maximum the transmission power.