Dual Power Electronic Mechanical Lock with Segmented Backup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic locks are unreliable when the control circuit or mechanical parts fail, as they cannot be unlocked, leading to security vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

A dual power electronic mechanical lock design that controls the rotation of main and auxiliary motors through an electronic control circuit, allowing the auxiliary motor to unlock the lock via an auxiliary mechanism, and includes a mechanical emergency unlock mechanism using a key to shift the slider and unlock the latch when electronic components fail.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an electronic lock uses a single power source and control circuit, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability decreases when the control circuit or mechanical parts fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlock reliabilityVSAvoiddual power system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lock system is segmented into two independent power sources (main power source and auxiliary power source) with separate control circuits. The main power source drives the main motor for normal operation, while the auxiliary power source drives the auxiliary motor for emergency operation. This segmentation ensures that failure of one power source or control circuit does not prevent the other from functioning, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity by distributing critical functions across separate subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The auxiliary power source and auxiliary motor are installed as a backup system before any failure occurs. The auxiliary motor is mechanically connected to the lock latch through the auxiliary mechanism, ready to take over if the main power source or control circuit fails. This prior cushioning approach ensures that the lock can still be unlocked even when the primary system fails, resolving the reliability concern without requiring complex real-time switching mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If an electronic lock relies solely on electronic control, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability decreases when electronic components fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into an electronic control circuit for normal operation and a mechanical key mechanism for emergency operation. The electronic control circuit provides convenient keyless entry through cards, codes, or biometrics, while the mechanical key mechanism serves as a backup when electronic components fail. This segmentation allows the system to maintain ease of operation under normal conditions while ensuring operational reliability through the mechanical backup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lock system is designed with multi-functionality to handle both electronic and mechanical operation modes. The lock body and latch mechanism are designed to accommodate both the motor-driven electronic unlocking and the key-driven mechanical unlocking. This universal design ensures that the same physical lock can be operated through multiple methods, resolving the contradiction between ease of electronic operation and reliability through mechanical backup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If a lock uses only mechanical unlocking mechanism, then the reliability is maintained when electronic parts fail, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic unlocking convenienceVSAvoidunlockability when electronic parts fail
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The unlocking mechanism is segmented into an electronic unlocking path (motor-driven) and a mechanical unlocking path (key-driven). The electronic control circuit controls the main motor to rotate the lock latch for convenient electronic unlocking. Simultaneously, the mechanical key mechanism is designed to directly drive the lock latch through the blade group and bracket when electronic systems fail. This dual-path segmentation allows the system to provide ease of operation through electronic means while maintaining reliability through the independent mechanical path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If the lock has a single unlocking mechanism, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability decreases when different failure scenarios occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to failure scenariosVSAvoiddual mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unlocking mechanism is segmented into distinct electronic and mechanical subsystems, each capable of independently unlocking the lock. The electronic subsystem includes the main motor and control circuit, while the mechanical subsystem includes the key, blade group, and bracket. This segmentation provides adaptability to different failure scenarios (electronic failure, mechanical failure, power failure) without requiring a completely different lock design, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lock system is designed with multi-functionality to handle various failure scenarios. The same lock body and latch mechanism can be operated through electronic means under normal conditions and through mechanical means when electronic components fail. The auxiliary motor and auxiliary mechanism provide an additional layer of adaptability for power failure scenarios. This universal design approach increases adaptability to different failure modes while keeping the overall structure integrated rather than requiring multiple separate locks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures the lock can be unlocked through both electronic and mechanical means, providing enhanced security and reliability by enabling operation even when primary power sources fail.

Implementation Method 1

the cam will be deflected to restrict the slider from moving at the torsion of the torsional spring installed on the cam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the torsional spring installed on the cam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Implementation Method 3

The vertically D-shape cam on the power output shaft of the primary power source is driven and connected by the slider through being connected with its special-shaped groove slider

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS10233671B2Dual power electronic mechanical lock
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 DU MINGHAO
  • US10233671B2 patent drawing
  • US10233671B2 patent drawing
  • US10233671B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dual-power electromechanical lock is provided. The lock comprises a lock cover and a lock body with a latch therein, wherein the latch is installed in the lock body by a rotation restoring mechanism, the lock body is provided with a main power device in transmission connection with the latch, the lock cover is provided with a key hole corresponding to a key, a mechanical power device corresponding to the main power device is provided inside the lock body, and the mechanical power device is in transmission connection with the main power device.