Dual-Processor Fire Alarm Detection for Low-Power Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing house fire alarms face challenges in achieving low power consumption, high sensitivity, and high reliability simultaneously, particularly in areas prone to false alarms like kitchens, where opto-electronic smoke detectors are sensitive but power-consuming, and constant-temperature thermal sensors are reliable but less sensitive.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage fire alarm device using two processors with different capabilities, where a first processor with lower capability processes a single light source at a low frame rate in standby mode, and a second processor with higher capability processes multiple light sources at a higher frame rate, combined with a thermal sensor to reduce false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an opto-electronic smoke detector uses a complicated algorithm to distinguish smoke types and reduce false alarm rate, then the false alarm rate is reduced, but the power consumption is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the processing system into two segments: a first processor that performs simple standby monitoring with low power consumption, and a second processor that performs complex smoke type identification and algorithm processing only when needed. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high reliability through comprehensive processing capability while reducing power consumption during normal operation by keeping only the simpler first processor active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first processor performs preliminary monitoring and detection of light intensity variations in standby mode. When it detects significant changes indicating potential smoke presence, it triggers the second processor to perform more detailed analysis. This preliminary action allows the complex algorithm to be executed only when necessary, reducing overall power consumption while maintaining the ability to detect and distinguish smoke types effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If an opto-electronic smoke detector operates continuously at high sensitivity to achieve early warning, then the sensitivity is improved, but the power consumption is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesensitivityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic operation modes where the system switches between standby mode (first processor only) and active detection mode (both processors). During standby, power consumption is minimized while maintaining basic monitoring capability. When smoke is detected, the system dynamically activates the second processor for high-sensitivity analysis and smoke type distinction, achieving high measurement precision only when needed rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic monitoring where the first processor checks light intensity variations at regular intervals in standby mode. When significant variations are detected, it triggers periodic detailed analysis by the second processor. This periodic action pattern allows the system to maintain sensitivity for early warning while significantly reducing power consumption compared to continuous high-sensitivity operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If a constant-temperature thermal sensor is used in areas prone to false alarms, then the reliability is improved, but the sensitivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoidsensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two different detection approaches: the thermal sensor provides reliable temperature-based detection with low false alarm rate, while the opto-electronic detector with dual-processor system provides sensitive smoke particle detection. The first processor handles thermal sensor data for reliable baseline monitoring, while the second processor enhances smoke type distinction when opto-electronic signals indicate smoke presence. This combination achieves both high reliability from thermal sensing and high sensitivity from opto-electronic detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves low power consumption, high sensitivity, and high reliability by effectively distinguishing between smoke and floating particles, reducing false alarms through a dual-processor system with a thermal sensor assist.

Implementation Method 1

The light sensor is configured to detect the light of first wavelength and the light of second wavelength, and respectively generate a first detection signal and a second detection signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The thermal sensor is configured to generate temperature values to be provided to at least one of the first processor and the second processor for being used in the identifying

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal detection:

Data Source

PatentUS12462669B2Firm alarm device having two processors
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 PIXART IMAGING INC
  • US12462669B2 patent drawing
  • US12462669B2 patent drawing
  • US12462669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a fire alarm device including multiple light sources, a light sensor, a first processor and a second processor. In a standby mode, the first processor identifies whether to wake up the second processor according to a detection result of the light sensor obtained by detecting emission light of one of the multiple light sources. The second processor identifies whether to generate an alarm according to a detection result of the light sensor obtained by detecting emission light of the multiple light sources. The fire alarm device further includes a thermal sensor for providing detected temperature values to the first processor and/or the second processor to perform the identifying procedure.